European Union and preferential arrangements

被引:3
|
作者
Tharakan, PKM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
来源
WORLD ECONOMY | 2002年 / 25卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9701.00497
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The driving force behind Preferential Arrangements (PAs)1 between countries is rarely economics alone. It was the profound wish to move away from the cycle of armed conflict between the European nations that prompted the creation of the European Coal and Steel Community which was the forerunner of the European Union (EU). It has also been argued that the move towards the next phase of the enlargement of the EU which is expected to see the entry of a number of Central and Eastern European countries into the Union, forms part of an effort to forestall a return to the Cold War division of Europe (Dehaene, 2000). Nevertheless economic considerations do play a very important role in Preferential Arrangements. Free trade among members, common external tariffs, free movement of factors of production, coordination of macro-economic policies and acceptance of a single currency are among some of the well-known phases which PAs might go through. Although PAs have a long history, they acquired considerable policy attention particularly since the early 1960s. In analysing the post World War II trends in Preferential Arrangements, some economists make a distinction between a first, and a second wave of such Arrangements. The first wave of PAs was inspired by the emergence of the European Economic Community. It appeared to lose momentum during the 1970s. The second wave starting in the 1980s has turned out to be far more powerful and continues to spread rapidly, even as the process of multilateral trade liberalisation makes progress under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Increasingly there are interlinkages between PAs of various types among countries located in different parts of the world.
引用
收藏
页码:1387 / 1398
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Future fiscal arrangements of the European Union
    Begg, I
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2004, 41 (03): : 775 - 794
  • [2] Preferential trading arrangements between the European Union and South America: The political economy of free trade zones in practice
    Vaillant, M
    Ons, A
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2002, 25 (10): : 1433 - 1468
  • [3] EUROPEAN UNION - LATIN AMERICA: ARRANGEMENTS AND COMPETITION
    Kosevich, Ekaterina Yu.
    [J]. MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2024, 68 (04):
  • [4] Preferential Tariff Formation: The Case of the European Union
    Joshi, Vivek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2011, 45 (05) : 901 - 951
  • [5] PREFERENTIAL ARRANGEMENTS
    GROSS, OA
    [J]. AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 1962, 69 (01): : 4 - &
  • [6] Institutional Arrangements and Logrolling: Evidence from the European Union
    Aksoy, Deniz
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 56 (03) : 538 - 552
  • [7] RESEARCH ON WORK FROM HOME ARRANGEMENTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Picu, Catalina Georgiana
    Tudor, Ion
    Predeteanu, Daniela
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES IN THE DIGITAL ERA (IMC 2018), 2018, : 138 - 145
  • [8] Review of participatory fisheries management arrangements in the European Union
    Leite, Laura
    Pita, Cristina
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2016, 74 : 268 - 278
  • [9] European Union - Preferential EPA/EBA sugar imports
    不详
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2013, 115 (1377): : 604 - 604
  • [10] NOTE ON PREFERENTIAL ARRANGEMENTS
    KAUFFMAN, DH
    [J]. AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 1963, 70 (01): : 62 - &