Impact of prenatal stress on mother-infant dyadic behavior during the still-face paradigm

被引:4
|
作者
Wolf, Isabell Ann-Cathrin [1 ]
Gilles, Maria [1 ]
Peus, Verena [1 ]
Scharnholz, Barbara [1 ]
Seibert, Julia [2 ]
Jennen-Steinmetz, Christine [3 ]
Krumm, Bertram [3 ]
Rietschel, Marcella [4 ]
Deuschle, Michael [1 ]
Laucht, Manfred [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Cent Inst Mental Hlth, Med Fac Mannheim, J 5, D-68159 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Clin Gen Psychiat, Ctr Psychosocial Med, Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Biostat, Cent Inst Mental Hlth, Med Fac Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Genet Epidemiol Psychiat, Cent Inst Mental Hlth, Med Fac Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Cent Inst Mental Hlth, Med Fac Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[6] Univ Potsdam, Dept Psychol, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Prenatal stress; Face-to-face still-face paradigm; Resilience; Psychosocial stress; Cortisol; DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY; MATERNAL SENSITIVITY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CUMULATIVE STRESS; CHILD-DEVELOPMENT; DIURNAL CORTISOL; PLASMA-CORTISOL; HPA AXIS; RESILIENCE; REACTIVITY;
D O I
10.1186/s40479-018-0078-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Mother-infant interaction provides important training for the infant's ability to cope with stress and the development of resilience. Prenatal stress (PS) and its impact on the offspring's development have long been a focus of stress research, with studies highlighting both harmful and beneficial effects. The aim of the current study was to examine the possible influence of both psychological stress and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity during pregnancy with mother-child dyadic behavior following stress exposure. Methods: The behavior of 164 mother-infant dyads during the still-face situation was filmed at six months postpartum and coded into three dyadic patterns: 1) both positive, 2) infant protesting-mother positive, and 3) infant protesting-mother negative. PS exposure was assessed prenatally according to psychological measures (i.e., psychopathological, perceived and psychosocial PS; n = 164) and HPA axis activity measures (maternal salivary cortisol, i.e., cortisol decline and area under the curve with respect to ground (AUCg); n = 134). Results: Mother-infant dyads in both the high-and low-stress groups showed decreasing positive and increasing negative dyadic behavior in the reunion episode, which is associated with the well-known "still-face" and "carry-over" effect. Furthermore, mother-infant dyads with higher psychosocial PS exhibited significantly more positive dyadic behavior than the low psychosocial PS group in the first play episode, but not in the reunion episode. Similarly, mother-infant dyads with high HPA axis activity (i.e. high AUCg) but steeper diurnal cortisol decline (i.e. cortisol decline) displayed significantly less negative behavior in the reunion episode than dyads with low HPA axis activity. No significant results were found for psychopathological stress and perceived stress. Conclusions: The results suggest a beneficial effect of higher psychosocial PS and higher prenatal maternal HPA axis activity in late gestation, which is in line with "stress inoculation" theories.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of prenatal stress on mother-infant dyadic behavior during the still-face paradigm
    Isabell Ann-Cathrin Wolf
    Maria Gilles
    Verena Peus
    Barbara Scharnholz
    Julia Seibert
    Christine Jennen-Steinmetz
    Bertram Krumm
    Marcella Rietschel
    Michael Deuschle
    Manfred Laucht
    [J]. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 5
  • [2] Infants' vagal regulation in the still-face paradigm is related to dyadic coordination of mother-infant interaction
    Moore, GA
    Calkins, SD
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 40 (06) : 1068 - 1080
  • [3] The impact of infant carrying on adolescent mother-infant interactions during the still-face task
    Williams, Lela Rankin
    [J]. INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 29 (03)
  • [4] Associations between mother-infant bed-sharing practices and infant affect and behavior during the still-face paradigm
    Lerner, Rachel E.
    Camerota, Marie
    Tully, Kristin P.
    Propper, Cathi
    [J]. INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 60
  • [5] Effects of maternal depression and panic disorder on mother-infant interactive behavior in the face-to-face still-face paradigm
    Weinberg, M. Katherine
    Beeghly, Marjorie
    Olson, Karen L.
    Tronick, Edward
    [J]. INFANT MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (05) : 472 - 491
  • [6] Mother-Infant Vagal Regulation in the Face-To-Face Still-Face Paradigm Is Moderated by Maternal Sensitivity
    Moore, Ginger A.
    Hill-Soderlund, Ashley L.
    Propper, Cathi B.
    Calkins, Susan D.
    Mills-Koonce, W. Roger.
    Cox, Martha J.
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 80 (01) : 209 - 223
  • [7] Mother-infant mutual eye gaze supports emotion regulation in infancy during the Still-Face paradigm
    MacLean, Peggy C.
    Rynes, Kristina N.
    Aragon, Crystal
    Caprihan, Arvind
    Phillips, John P.
    Lowe, Jean R.
    [J]. INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 37 (04): : 512 - 522
  • [8] Still-face and separation effects on depressed mother-infant interactions
    Field, Tiffany
    Hernandez-Reif, Maria
    Diego, Miguel
    Feijo, Larissa
    Vera, Yanexy
    Gil, Karla
    Sanders, Chris
    [J]. INFANT MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (03) : 314 - 323
  • [9] Emerging patterns of infant regulatory behavior in the Still-Face paradigm at 3 and 9 months predict mother-infant attachment at 12 months
    Barbosa, Miguel
    Beeghly, Marjorie
    Moreira, Joao
    Tronick, Ed
    Fuertes, Marina
    [J]. ATTACHMENT & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 23 (06) : 814 - 830
  • [10] Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to assess maternal and infant contributions to mother-infant affective exchanges during the Still-Face Paradigm
    Boeve, Jordan L.
    Beeghly, Marjorie
    Stacks, Ann M.
    Manning, Janessa H.
    Thomason, Moriah E.
    [J]. INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 57