Postoperative pain treatment after spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses

被引:10
|
作者
Geisler, Anja [1 ]
Zachodnik, Josephine [1 ,2 ]
Koppen, Kasper [1 ]
Chakari, Rehan [3 ]
Bech-Azeddine, Rachid [4 ]
机构
[1] Zealand Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Lykkebaekvej 1, DK-4600 Koege, Denmark
[2] Lund Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Lund, Sweden
[3] Akad Univ Hosp Uppsala, Dept Surg Sci Plast Surg, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Rigshosp, Ctr Rheumatol & Spine Dis, Sect Spine Surg, Copenhagen Spine Res Unit CSRU, Glostrup, Denmark
关键词
Spinal fusion; Pain; Analgesics; Pain treatment; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; INTRATHECAL MORPHINE; MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA; OPIOID CONSUMPTION; MANAGEMENT; KETAMINE; PREGABALIN; RELIEF; GLUCOCORTICOIDS;
D O I
10.1097/PR9.0000000000001005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Patients undergoing spinal surgery are at high risk of acute and persistent postoperative pain. Therefore, adequate pain relief is crucial. This systematic review aimed to provide answers about best-proven postoperative analgesic treatment for patients undergoing lumbar 1- or 2-level fusions for degenerative spine diseases. We performed a search in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was opioid consumption after 24 hours postoperatively. We performed meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses, and Grading of Recommendations assessment to accommodate systematic errors. Forty-four randomized controlled trials were included with 2983 participants. Five subgroups emerged: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), epidural, ketamine, local infiltration analgesia, and intrathecal morphine. The results showed a significant reduction in opioid consumption for treatment with NSAID (P < 0.0008) and epidural (P < 0.0006) (predefined minimal clinical relevance of 10 mg). Concerning secondary outcomes, significant reductions in pain scores were detected after 6 hours at rest (NSAID [P < 0.0001] and intrathecal morphine [P < 0.0001]), 6 hours during mobilization (intrathecal morphine [P = 0.003]), 24 hours at rest (epidural [P < 0.00001] and ketamine [P < 0.00001]), and 24 hours during mobilization (intrathecal morphine [P = 0.03]). The effect of wound infiltration was nonsignificant. The quality of evidence was low to very low for most trials. The results from this systematic review showed that some analgesic interventions have the capability to reduce opioid consumption compared with control groups. However, because of the high risk of bias and low evidence, it was impossible to recommend a "gold standard" for the analgesic treatment after 1- or 2-level spinal fusion surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preventing pain after breast surgery: A systematic review with meta-analyses and trial-sequential analyses
    Lepot, Ariane
    Elia, Nadia
    Tramer, Martin Richard
    Rehberg, Benno
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 25 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [2] Benefit and harm of pregabalin in acute pain treatment: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
    Fabritius, M. L.
    Strom, C.
    Koyuncu, S.
    Jaeger, P.
    Petersen, P. L.
    Geisler, A.
    Wetterslev, J.
    Dahl, J. B.
    Mathiesen, O.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (04) : 775 - 791
  • [3] Gabapentin in procedure-specific postoperative pain management - preplanned subgroup analyses from a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
    Fabritius, Maria Louise
    Geisler, Anja
    Petersen, Pernille Lykke
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    Mathiesen, Ole
    Dahl, Jorgen Berg
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [4] Gabapentin in procedure-specific postoperative pain management – preplanned subgroup analyses from a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
    Maria Louise Fabritius
    Anja Geisler
    Pernille Lykke Petersen
    Jørn Wetterslev
    Ole Mathiesen
    Jørgen Berg Dahl
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 17
  • [5] Gabapentin for post-operative pain management - a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
    Fabritius, M. L.
    Geisler, A.
    Petersen, P. L.
    Nikolajsen, L.
    Hansen, M. S.
    Kontinen, V.
    Hamunen, K.
    Dahl, J. B.
    Wetterslev, J.
    Mathiesen, O.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 60 (09) : 1188 - 1208
  • [6] Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    Ang, W. W.
    Boutong, S.
    Shetty, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [7] Fever therapy in febrile adults: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
    Holgersson, Johan
    Ceric, Ameldina
    Sethi, Naqash
    Nielsen, Niklas
    Jakobsen, Janus Christian
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 378
  • [8] Effects of acupuncture on ischemic stroke: A systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
    Zhong, Xiaoying
    Luo, Xiaochao
    Li, Ling
    Liu, Jiali
    Sun, Xin
    Zhang, Honglai
    [J]. COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 57
  • [9] Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of treatment of acute postoperative pain: a review
    Espitalier, F.
    Tavernier, E.
    Remerand, F.
    Laffon, M.
    Fusciardi, J.
    Giraudeau, B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 111 (06) : 897 - 906
  • [10] Dose-related beneficial and harmful effects of gabapentin in postoperative pain management - post hoc analyses from a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
    Fabritius, Maria Louise
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    Mathiesen, Ole
    Dahl, Jorgen B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 10 : 2547 - 2563