Robotic Spine Surgery: Past, Present, and Future

被引:28
|
作者
Perfetti, Dean C. [1 ]
Kisinde, Stanley [2 ]
Rogers-LaVanne, Mary P. [2 ]
Satin, Alexander M. [2 ]
Lieberman, Isador H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New Hyde Pk, NY USA
[2] Texas Back Inst, Plano, TX 75093 USA
关键词
cervical pedicle screws; enabling technology; endoscopic spine surgery; minimally invasive spine surgery; robotic spine surgery; PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH; LUMBAR SPINE; IMAGE GUIDANCE; LEARNING-CURVE; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; INSERTION; FIXATION; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000004357
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review. Objective. The aim of this review is to present an overview of robotic spine surgery (RSS) including its history, applications, limitations, and future directions. Summary of Background Data. The first RSS platform received United States Food and Drug Administration approval in 2004. Since then, robotic-assisted placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws has been extensively studied. More recently, expanded applications of RSS have been introduced and evaluated. Methods. A systematic search of the Cochrane, OVID-MEDLINE, and PubMed databases was performed for articles relevant to robotic spine surgery. Institutional review board approval was not needed. Results. The placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using RSS is safe and accurate and results in reduced radiation exposure for the surgeon and surgical team. Barriers to utilization exist including learning curve and large capital costs. Additional applications involving minimally invasive techniques, cervical pedicle screws, and deformity correction have emerged. Conclusion. Interest in RSS continues to grow as the applications advance in parallel with image guidance systems and minimally invasive techniques. IRB Approval. N/A.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 921
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Past, Present, and Future of Robotic Surgery
    Maza, Guillermo
    Sharma, Arun
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 53 (06) : 935 - +
  • [2] Endoscopic Spine Surgery Past, Present, and Future
    Hasan, Saqib
    Hofstetter, Christoph P.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2019, 77 (01): : 75 - 84
  • [3] Robotic Spine Surgery: Past, Present, and Future (vol 47, pg 909, 2022)
    Perfetti, D. C.
    Kisinde, S.
    Rogers-LaVanne, M. P.
    [J]. SPINE, 2022, 47 (22) : E625 - E625
  • [4] Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: Past, Present, and Future
    Chen, Chi Chiung Grace
    Falcone, Tommaso
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 52 (03): : 335 - 343
  • [5] Robotic urologic surgery: Past, present and future
    Vipul R.Patel
    [J]. Asian Journal of Urology., 2021, (01)
  • [6] ROBOTIC UROLOGIC SURGERY: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
    Moran, M. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A238 - A238
  • [7] Robotic urologic surgery: Past, present and future
    Patel, Vipul R.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 8 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [8] Past, present and future of urological robotic surgery
    Jeong, Wooju
    Kumar, Ramesh
    Menon, Mani
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2016, 57 (02) : 75 - 83
  • [9] Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future
    Camarillo, DB
    Krummel, TM
    Salisbury, JK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (4A): : 2S - 15S
  • [10] Augmented reality in spine surgery - past, present, and future
    Azad, Tej D.
    Warman, Anmol
    Tracz, Jovanna A.
    Hughes, Liam P.
    Judy, Brendan F.
    Witham, Timothy F.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (01): : 1 - 13