High-order moments and extreme value approach for value-at-risk

被引:11
|
作者
Lin, Chu-Hsiung [1 ]
Changchien, Chang-Cheng [2 ]
Kao, Tzu-Chuan [3 ]
Kao, Wei-Shun [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Kaohsiung First Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Finance, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
[2] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Dept Finance, Tainan 71101, Taiwan
[3] Kun Shan Univ, Dept Finance & Banking, Yung Kang 710, Tainan Hsien, Taiwan
关键词
Value-at-Risk; Skewed generalized t distribution; Extreme value theory; Tail-index; VaR-x method; GENERALIZED-T DISTRIBUTION; CONDITIONAL SKEWNESS; STOCK RETURNS; VOLATILITY; MODELS; KURTOSIS; TAIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jempfin.2014.10.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We modify a two-step approach by McNeil and Frey (2000) for forecasting Value-at-Risk (VaR). Our approach combines the asymmetric GARCH (GJR) model that allows the high-order moments (i.e., skewness and kurtosis) of the skewed generalized t (SGT) distribution to rely on the past information set to estimate volatility, and the modified Hill estimator (Huisman et al., 2001) for estimating the innovation distribution tail of the GJR model. Using back-testing of the daily return series of 10 stock markets, the empirical results show that our proposed approach could give better one-day VaR forecasts than McNeil and Frey (2000) and the GJR/GARCH models with alternative distributions. In addition, our proposed approach also provides the accuracy of expected shortfall estimates. The evidence demonstrates that our proposed two-step approach that incorporates the modified Hill estimator into the GJR model based on the SGT density with autoregressive conditional skewness and kurtosis provides consistently accurate VaR forecasts in the short and longer sample periods. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 434
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value-at-risk and extreme value distributions for financial returns
    Tolikas, Konstantinos
    [J]. Journal of Risk, 2008, 10 (03): : 31 - 77
  • [2] High volatility, thick tails and extreme value theory in value-at-risk estimation
    Gençay, R
    Selçuk, F
    Ulugülyagci, A
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2003, 33 (02): : 337 - 356
  • [3] A Credibility Framework for Extreme Value-at-Risk
    Mitic, Peter
    [J]. MATHEMATICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 18 (02)
  • [4] A SEQUENTIAL ELIMINATION APPROACH TO VALUE-AT-RISK AND CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK SELECTION
    Hepworth, Adam J.
    Atkinson, Michael P.
    Szechtman, Roberto
    [J]. 2017 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2017, : 2324 - 2335
  • [5] Liquidity-adjusted value-at-risk using extreme value theory and copula approach
    Kamal, Harish
    Paul, Samit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2024, 43 (06) : 1747 - 1769
  • [6] Stock index Value-at-Risk forecasting: A realized volatility extreme value theory approach
    Louzis, Dimitrios P.
    Xanthopoulos-Sissinis, Spyros
    Refenes, Apostolos P.
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2012, 32 (01): : 981 - 991
  • [7] Empirical comparison of conventional methods and extreme value theory approach in value-at-risk assessment
    Totic, Selena
    Bulajic, Milica
    Vlastelica, Tamara
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (33): : 12810 - 12818
  • [8] Incorporating Higher Moments into Value-at-Risk Forecasting
    Polanski, Arnold
    Stoja, Evarist
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2010, 29 (06) : 523 - 535
  • [9] High volatility, thick tails and extreme value theory in Value-at-Risk estimation.
    Ramazan, G
    Faruk, S
    Abdurrahman, U
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2003, 32 (01): : 169 - 169
  • [10] Risk model validation for BRICS countries: a value-at-risk, expected shortfall and extreme value theory approach
    Wing, Jean Paul Chung
    Gonpot, Preethee Nunkoo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK MODEL VALIDATION, 2015, 9 (03): : 1 - 22