Will the Volume-Based Procurement Policy Promote Pharmaceutical Firms' R&D Investment in China? An Event Study Approach

被引:10
|
作者
Hu, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Chen, Shouming [1 ]
Qiu, Fangjun [1 ]
Chen, Peien [2 ]
Chen, Shaoxiong [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Coll Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Shanghai Biopharmaceut Ind Assoc, Shanghai 201203, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
innovation; pharmaceutical firms; firm value; R&D intensity; 4+7" volume-based procurement policy; event study; DiD; DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY EVIDENCE; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; INNOVATION; MANAGERIAL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph182212037
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Innovation is the key to the development of the pharmaceutical industry. The pilot program of China's "4 + 7" volume-based procurement policy ("4 + 7" procurement policy) brings the drug price back to a reasonable level through trading procurement quantities for lower drug prices. The policy manages to reduce the burden of the health care system, improve efficiency, and push the pharmaceutical industry to transform and update from the era of high gross profit of generic drugs to innovative drugs. So far, few studies have investigated the influence of the volume-based procurement policy on the innovation of pharmaceutical firms. By combining the event study and Difference-in-Difference (DiD) methodology, this study finds that the abnormal return (AR) of firms with high R&D intensity is lower than that of firms with low R&D intensity during the event window period. Moreover, further analysis identifies the moderating effect of firm size and firm type. Specifically, the results show that the negative influence of high R&D intensity on abnormal return (AR) during the announcement of the "4 + 7" procurement policy is stronger in large firms and innovative pharmaceutical firms. Finally, we discuss the policy implications of our study.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does China's national volume-based drug procurement policy promote or hinder pharmaceutical innovation?
    Li, Xiujuan
    Xu, Jiachun
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [2] Influence of Chinese National Centralized Drug Procurement policy on pharmaceutical corporate R&D investment
    Liu, Hang
    Fang, Xinglong
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [3] Tax Policy and R&D Investment by Australian Firms*
    Thomson, Russell
    ECONOMIC RECORD, 2010, 86 (273) : 260 - 280
  • [4] Impact of National Centralized Drug Procurement policy on chemical pharmaceutical enterprises' R&D investment: a difference-in-differences analysis in China
    Li, Jiaming
    Zhang, Xinyue
    Wang, Rui
    Cao, Keyao
    Wan, Luhui
    Ren, Xu
    Ding, Jinxi
    Li, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [5] Firms and banks common ownership, economic policy uncertainty, and firms' R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Lu, Yiming
    Wang, Yu
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 60
  • [6] Improving access to medicines and beyond: the national volume-based procurement policy in China
    Zhu, Zheng
    Wang, Quan
    Sun, Qiang
    Lexchin, Joel
    Yang, Li
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 8 (07):
  • [7] Challenges and countermeasures for China's centralised volume-based procurement policy in healthcare
    Chang, Qi
    Tian, Yihui
    Gao, Lingyun
    Xia, Nan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 39 (05): : 1330 - 1349
  • [8] Privatization, Public R&D Policy, and Private R&D Investment in China's Agriculture
    Hu, Ruifa
    Liang, Qin
    Pray, Carl
    Huang, Jikun
    Jin, Yanhong
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 36 (02) : 416 - 432
  • [9] Volume-Based R&D tax Credits and Behavioural Additionality in YICs
    Teirlinck, Peter
    Neicu, Daniel
    Spithoven, Andre
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 672 - 679
  • [10] Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms
    McGrath, RG
    Nerkar, A
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (01) : 1 - 21