Structural validation and assessment of AlphaFold2 predictions for centrosomal and centriolar proteins and their complexes

被引:32
|
作者
van Breugel, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Silva, Ivan Rosa E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Andreeva, Antonina [2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Biol & Behav Sci, 4 Newark St, London E1 2AT, England
[2] Med Res Council Lab Mol Biol, Francis Crick Ave, Cambridge CB2 0QH, England
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Candido Portinari St, BR-13083871 Campinas, Brazil
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
CILIOGENESIS; DIFFRACTION; REFINEMENT; CEP164; MODEL; NMR;
D O I
10.1038/s42003-022-03269-0
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Using experimental data, the authors assess the quality and discuss the limitations of AlphaFold2 predictions of protein structures and protein-protein interactions essential for centrosome and centriole biogenesis. Obtaining the high-resolution structures of proteins and their complexes is a crucial aspect of understanding the mechanisms of life. Experimental structure determination methods are time-consuming, expensive and cannot keep pace with the growing number of protein sequences available through genomic DNA sequencing. Thus, the ability to accurately predict the structure of proteins from their sequence is a holy grail of structural and computational biology that would remove a bottleneck in our efforts to understand as well as rationally engineer living systems. Recent advances in protein structure prediction, in particular the breakthrough with the AI-based tool AlphaFold2 (AF2), hold promise for achieving this goal, but the practical utility of AF2 remains to be explored. Focusing on proteins with essential roles in centrosome and centriole biogenesis, we demonstrate the quality and usability of the AF2 prediction models and we show that they can provide important insights into the modular organization of two key players in this process, CEP192 and CEP44. Furthermore, we used the AF2 algorithm to elucidate and then experimentally validate previously unknown prime features in the structure of TTBK2 bound to CEP164, as well as the Chibby1-FAM92A complex for which no structural information was available to date. These findings have important implications in understanding the regulation and function of these complexes. Finally, we also discuss some practical limitations of AF2 and anticipate the implications for future research approaches in the centriole/centrosome field.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Structural validation and assessment of AlphaFold2 predictions for centrosomal and centriolar proteins and their complexes
    Mark van Breugel
    Ivan Rosa e Silva
    Antonina Andreeva
    Communications Biology, 5
  • [2] A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
    Akdel, Mehmet
    Pires, Douglas E., V
    Porta Pardo, Eduard
    Janes, Jurgen
    Zalevsky, Arthur O.
    Meszaros, Balint
    Bryant, Patrick
    Good, Lydia L.
    Laskowski, Roman A.
    Pozzati, Gabriele
    Shenoy, Aditi
    Zhu, Wensi
    Kundrotas, Petras
    Serra, Victoria Ruiz
    Rodrigues, Carlos H. M.
    Dunham, Alistair S.
    Burke, David
    Borkakoti, Neera
    Velankar, Sameer
    Frost, Adam
    Basquin, Jerome
    Lindorff-Larsen, Kresten
    Bateman, Alex
    Kajava, Andrey, V
    Valencia, Alfonso
    Ovchinnikov, Sergey
    Durairaj, Janani
    Ascher, David B.
    Thornton, Janet M.
    Davey, Norman E.
    Stein, Amelie
    Elofsson, Arne
    Croll, Tristan, I
    Beltrao, Pedro
    NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (11) : 1056 - +
  • [3] A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
    Mehmet Akdel
    Douglas E. V. Pires
    Eduard Porta Pardo
    Jürgen Jänes
    Arthur O. Zalevsky
    Bálint Mészáros
    Patrick Bryant
    Lydia L. Good
    Roman A. Laskowski
    Gabriele Pozzati
    Aditi Shenoy
    Wensi Zhu
    Petras Kundrotas
    Victoria Ruiz Serra
    Carlos H. M. Rodrigues
    Alistair S. Dunham
    David Burke
    Neera Borkakoti
    Sameer Velankar
    Adam Frost
    Jérôme Basquin
    Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
    Alex Bateman
    Andrey V. Kajava
    Alfonso Valencia
    Sergey Ovchinnikov
    Janani Durairaj
    David B. Ascher
    Janet M. Thornton
    Norman E. Davey
    Amelie Stein
    Arne Elofsson
    Tristan I. Croll
    Pedro Beltrao
    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2022, 29 : 1056 - 1067
  • [4] AlphaFold2 and the future of structural biology
    Patrick Cramer
    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2021, 28 : 704 - 705
  • [5] What Is the Crystallographic Resolution of Structural Models of Proteins Generated with AlphaFold2?
    Carugo, Oliviero
    ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2024, 19 (10) : 2141 - 2143
  • [6] AlphaFold2 and the future of structural biology
    Cramer, Patrick
    NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (09) : 704 - 705
  • [7] Assessment of AlphaFold2 for Human Proteins via Residue Solvent Exposure
    Bask, Kristoffer T.
    Kepp, Kasper P.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2022, 62 (14) : 3391 - 3400
  • [9] Ins and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions
    Hegedus, Tamas
    Geisler, Markus
    Lukacs, Gergely Laszlo
    Farkas, Bianka
    CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 2022, 79 (01)