Handling epistemic uncertainties in PRA using evidential networks

被引:1
|
作者
Wang Dong [1 ]
Chen Jin [1 ]
Cheng Zhi-jun [1 ]
Guo Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Informat Syst & Management, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
probabilistic risk assessment; epistemic uncertainty; evidence theory; evidential network; EVENT TREE ANALYSIS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FAULT-TREE; PROPAGATION; SYSTEMS; REPRESENTATIONS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-014-2423-4
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
In order to overcome the limitations of traditional methods in uncertainty analysis, a modified Bayesian network (BN), which is called evidence network (EN), was proposed with evidence theory to handle epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). Fault trees (FTs) and event trees (ETs) were transformed into an EN which is used as a uniform framework to represent accident scenarios. Epistemic uncertainties of basic events in PRA were presented in evidence theory form and propagated through the network. A case study of a highway tunnel risk analysis was discussed to demonstrate the proposed approach. Frequencies of end states are obtained and expressed by belief and plausibility measures. The proposed approach addresses the uncertainties in experts' knowledge and can be easily applied to uncertainty analysis of FTs/ETs that have dependent events.
引用
收藏
页码:4261 / 4269
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Handling epistemic uncertainties in PRA using evidential networks
    王冬
    陈进
    程志君
    郭波
    [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21 (11) : 4261 - 4269
  • [2] Handling epistemic uncertainties in PRA using evidential networks
    Dong Wang
    Jin Chen
    Zhi-jun Cheng
    Bo Guo
    [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21 : 4261 - 4269
  • [3] Handling epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in probabilistic circuits
    Federico Cerutti
    Lance M. Kaplan
    Angelika Kimmig
    Murat Şensoy
    [J]. Machine Learning, 2022, 111 : 1259 - 1301
  • [4] Handling epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in probabilistic circuits
    Cerutti, Federico
    Kaplan, Lance M.
    Kimmig, Angelika
    Sensoy, Murat
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2022, 111 (04) : 1259 - 1301
  • [5] Handling dependencies in Probabilistic Risk Assessments using Evidential Networks
    Wang, D.
    Cheng, Z. J.
    Jiang, P.
    Guo, B.
    [J]. SAFETY AND RELIABILITY: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, : 1421 - 1429
  • [6] Handling epistemic uncertainties in fault tree analysis by probabilistic and possibilistic approaches
    Flage, R.
    Baraldi, P.
    Ameruso, F.
    Zio, E.
    Aven, T.
    [J]. RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1761 - +
  • [7] HOW EVIDENTIAL IS THE EPISTEMIC CONDITIONAL?
    Celle, Agnes
    [J]. ANUARI DE FILOLOGIA-ESTUDIS DE LINGUISTICA, 2020, 10 : 77 - 104
  • [8] Epistemic Disjunctivism and the Evidential Problem
    Zalabardo, Jose
    [J]. ANALYSIS, 2015, 75 (04) : 615 - 627
  • [9] Uncertainties handling in safety system performance assessment by using fuzzy Bayesian networks
    Mechri, Walid
    Snene, Wassim
    Ben Othman, Kamel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (02) : 995 - 1006
  • [10] Wildfire Prediction: Handling Uncertainties Using Integrated Bayesian Networks and Fuzzy Logic
    Naderpour, Mohsen
    Rizeei, Hossein Mojaddadi
    Ramezani, Fahimeh
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2020,