Sample Size Calculation in Clinical Trials Part 13 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications

被引:100
|
作者
Roehrig, Bernd
du Prel, Jean-Baptist [1 ]
Wachtlin, Daniel [2 ]
Kwiecien, Robert
Blettner, Maria [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Inst Epidemiol, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med, IZKS, Mainz, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, IMBEI, Mainz, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2010年 / 107卷 / 31-32期
关键词
MEDICAL-RESEARCH; COHORT;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2010.0552
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In this article, we discuss the purpose of sample size calculation in clinical trials, the need for it, and the methods by which it is accomplished. Study samples that are either too small or too large are unacceptable, for clinical, methodological, and ethical reasons. The physicians participating in clinical trials should be directly involved in sample size planning, because their expertise and knowledge of the literature are indispensable. Methods: We explain the process of sample size calculation on the basis of articles retrieved by a selective search of the international literature, as well as our own experience. Results: We present a fictitious clinical trial in which two antihypertensive agents are to be compared to each other with a t-test and then show how the appropriate size of the study sample should be calculated. Next, we describe the general principles of sample size calculation that apply when any kind of statistical test is to be used. We give further illustrative examples and explain what types of expert medical knowledge and assumptions are needed to calculate the appropriate sample size for each. These generally depend on the particular statistical test that is to be performed. Conclusion: In any clinical trial, the sample size has to be planned on a justifiable, rational basis. The purpose of sample size calculation is to determine the optimal number of participants (patients) to be included in the trial. Sample size calculation requires the collaboration of experienced biostatisticians and physician-researchers: expert medical knowledge is an essential part of it.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 556
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Controlled Trials Part 17 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
    Kabisch, Maria
    Ruckes, Christian
    Seibert-Grafe, Monika
    Blettner, Maria
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (39): : 663 - 668
  • [2] On the Proper Use of the Crossover Design in Clinical Trials Part 18 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
    Wellek, Stefan
    Blettner, Maria
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (15): : 276 - 281
  • [3] The Range and Scientific Value of Randomized Trials Part 24 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
    Lange, Stefan
    Sauerland, Stefan
    Lauterberg, Joerg
    Windeler, Juergen
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 114 (38): : 635 - 640
  • [4] Establishing Equivalence or Non-Inferiority in Clinical Trials Part 20 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
    Wellek, Stefan
    Blettner, Maria
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (41): : 674 - 679
  • [5] Screening Part 19 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
    Spix, Claudia
    Blettner, Maria
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (21): : 385 - U17
  • [6] Concordance Analysis Part 16 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
    Kwiecien, Robert
    Kopp-Schneider, Annette
    Blettner, Maria
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (30): : 515 - 521
  • [7] Sample size calculation of clinical trials in geriatric medicine
    D'Arrigo, Graziella
    Roumeliotis, Stefanos
    Torino, Claudia
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    [J]. AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (05) : 1209 - 1212
  • [8] Sample size calculation of clinical trials in geriatric medicine
    Graziella D’Arrigo
    Stefanos Roumeliotis
    Claudia Torino
    Giovanni Tripepi
    [J]. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2021, 33 : 1209 - 1212
  • [9] Studies for the Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests Part 28 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
    Hoyer, Annika
    Zapf, Antonia
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 118 (33-34): : 555 - +
  • [10] Clinical trials with mechanism evaluation of intervention(s): mind the power and sample size calculation
    Lee, Kim May
    Hellier, Jennifer
    Emsley, Richard
    [J]. TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)