Calibrating Variations in Biomarker Measures for Improving Prediction with Time-to-event Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Zheng, Cheng [1 ]
Zheng, Yingye [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Joseph J Zilber Sch Publ Hlth, Milwaukee, WI 53205 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Biostat Program, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Biomarker; Corrected score; Measurement error; Regression calibration; Risk prediction; DEPENDENT ROC CURVES; MEASUREMENT ERROR; COX REGRESSION; SUBJECT;
D O I
10.1007/s12561-019-09235-5
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Novel biologic markers have been used to predict clinical outcomes of many diseases. One specific feature of biomarkers is that they often are measured with variations due to factors such as sample preparation and specific laboratory process. Statistical methods have been proposed to characterize the effects of underlying error-free quantity in association with an outcome, yet the impact of measurement errors in terms of prediction has not been well studied. We focus in this manuscript on using biomarkers for predicting an individual's future risk for survival outcome. In the setting where replicates of error-prone biomarkers are available in a 'training' population and risk projection is applied to individuals in a 'prediction' population, we propose two-step measurement-error-corrected estimators of absolute risks. We conducted numerical studies to evaluate the predictive performance of the proposed and routine approaches under various assumptions about the measurement error distributions to pinpoint situations when correction of measurement errors might be necessary. We studied the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators. We applied the estimators to a liver cancer biomarker study to predict risk of liver cancer incidence using age and a novel biomarker, alpha-Fetoprotein.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 503
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calibrating Variations in Biomarker Measures for Improving Prediction with Time-to-event Outcomes
    Cheng Zheng
    Yingye Zheng
    [J]. Statistics in Biosciences, 2019, 11 : 477 - 503
  • [2] Model-based estimation of measures of association for time-to-event outcomes
    Federico Ambrogi
    Elia Biganzoli
    Patrizia Boracchi
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [3] Model-based estimation of measures of association for time-to-event outcomes
    Ambrogi, Federico
    Biganzoli, Elia
    Boracchi, Patrizia
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [4] Time-to-Event Endpoints in Imaging Biomarker Studies
    Chen, Ruizhe
    Wang, Hao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024,
  • [5] Prediction of Conversion to Alzheimer's Disease with Longitudinal Measures and Time-To-Event Data
    Li, Kan
    Chan, Wenyaw
    Doody, Rachelle S.
    Quinn, Joseph
    Luo, Sheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2017, 58 (02) : 360 - 370
  • [6] Discrimination measures for discrete time-to-event predictions
    Schmid, Matthias
    Tutz, Gerhard
    Welchowski, Thomas
    [J]. ECONOMETRICS AND STATISTICS, 2018, 7 : 153 - 164
  • [7] Prediction Accuracy Measures for a Nonlinear Model and for Right-Censored Time-to-Event Data
    Li, Gang
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 114 (528) : 1815 - 1825
  • [8] Sufficient Cause Interaction for Time-to-event Outcomes
    Stensrud, Mats Julius
    Ryalen, Pal Christie
    Roysland, Kjetil
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [9] Reflections on the Win Ratio With Time-to-Event Outcomes
    Wittes, Janet
    [J]. CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2024, 17 (09)
  • [10] Comparing statistical methods in assessing the prognostic effect of biomarker variability on time-to-event clinical outcomes
    Gao, Feng
    Luo, Jingqin
    Liu, Jingxia
    Wan, Fei
    Wang, Guoqiao
    Gordon, Mae
    Xiong, Chengjie
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)