On the comparison of tidal gravity parameters with tidal models in central Europe

被引:6
|
作者
Ducarme, B. [1 ]
Palinkas, V. [2 ]
Meurers, B. [3 ]
Cui Xiaoming [4 ]
Val'ko, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Georges Lemaitre Ctr Earth & Climate Res, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Geodet Observ Pecny, Res Inst Geodesy Topog & Cartog, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Vienna, Dept Meteorol & Geophys, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Geodesy & Earths Dynam, Inst Geodesy & Geophys, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Superconducting Gravimeter (SG); Ocean Tides Loading Computations; Body Tides Models; EARTH; TIDES; GRAVIMETERS; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jog.2014.02.011
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Two accurately calibrated superconducting gravimeters (SGs) provide high quality tidal gravity records in three central European stations: C025 in Vienna and at Conrad observatory (A) and OSG050 in Pecny (CZ). To correct the tidal gravity factors from ocean loading effects we compared the load vectors from different ocean tides models (OTMs) computed with different software: OLFG/OLMP by the Free Ocean Tides Loading Provider (FLP), ICET and NLOADF. Even with the recent OTMs the mass conservation is critical but the methods used to correct the mass imbalance agree within 0.1 nm/s(2). Although the different software agrees, FLP probably provides more accurate computations as this software has been optimised. For our final computation we used the mean load vector computed by FLP for 8 OTMs (CSR4, NAO99, GOT00, TPX07, FES04, DTU10, EOT11a and HAMTIDE). The corrected tidal factors of the 3 stations agree better than 0.04% in amplitude and 0.02 degrees in phase. Considering the weighted mean of the three stations we get for O1 delta(c) = 1.1535 +/- 0.0001, for K1 delta(c) = 1.1352 +/- 0.0003 and for M2 delta(c) = 1.1621 +/- 0.0003. These values confirm previous ones obtained with 16 European stations. The theoretical body tides model DDW99/NH provides the best agreement for M2 (1.1620) and MATH01/NH for O1 (1.1540) and K1 (1.1350). The largest discrepancy is for 01(0.05%). The corrected phase alpha(c) does not differ significantly from zero except for K1 and S2. The calibrations of the two SG's are consistent within 0.025% and agree with Strasbourg results within 0.05%. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF TIDAL GRAVITY OBSERVATIONS WITH SEA TIDAL MODELS
    GERSTENECKER, C
    GROTEN, E
    [J]. RIVISTA ITALIANA DI GEOFISICA E SCIENZE AFFINI, 1976, 3 (5-6): : 213 - 217
  • [2] Ocean Tidal Models and Tidal Gravity Observation
    Timofeev, V. Yu
    Valitov, M. G.
    Ardyukov, D. G.
    Timofeev, A., V
    Ducarme, B.
    Kulinich, R. G.
    Kolpashikova, T. N.
    Proshkina, Z. N.
    Boyko, E., V
    Naymov, S. B.
    [J]. OCEANOLOGY, 2020, 60 (01) : 29 - 39
  • [3] Ocean Tidal Models and Tidal Gravity Observation
    V. Yu. Timofeev
    M. G. Valitov
    D. G. Ardyukov
    A. V. Timofeev
    B. Ducarme
    R. G. Kulinich
    T. N. Kolpashikova
    Z. N. Proshkina
    E. V. Boyko
    S. B. Naymov
    [J]. Oceanology, 2020, 60 : 29 - 39
  • [4] A new tidal analysis of superconducting gravity observations in Western and Central Europe
    Habel, Branislav
    Meurers, Bruno
    [J]. CONTRIBUTIONS TO GEOPHYSICS AND GEODESY, 2014, 44 (01): : 1 - 24
  • [5] A Comparison of Tidal Conversion Parameterizations for Tidal Models
    Green, J. A. Mattias
    Nycander, Jonas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2013, 43 (01) : 104 - 119
  • [6] TIDAL GRAVITY AND OCEAN TIDE LOADING IN EUROPE
    BAKER, TF
    EDGE, RJ
    JEFFRIES, G
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 107 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [8] European Tidal Gravity Observations: Comparison with Earth Tide Models and Estimation of the Free Core Nutation (FCN) Parameters
    Ducarme, B.
    Rosat, S.
    Vandercoilden, L.
    Jian-Qiao, Xu
    Sun Heping
    [J]. OBSERVING OUR CHANGING EARTH, 2009, 133 : 523 - +
  • [9] Accurate correction models for tidal gravity in Chinese continent
    Zhou Jiang-Cun
    Xu Jian-Qiao
    Sun He-Ping
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2009, 52 (06): : 1474 - 1482
  • [10] Comparison between inelastic earth models constructed from astrometric and tidal gravity data
    S. M. Molodensky
    [J]. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2006, 42 : 546 - 550