Effect of mucosa thicknesses on stress distribution of implant-supported overdentures under unilateral loading: Photoelastic analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Ozyilmaz, Ozgun Yusuf [1 ]
Aykent, Filiz [2 ]
Ozel, Gulsum Sayin [3 ]
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Vatan Rd, TR-34214 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Solitary implants; photoelastic analysis; mucosa thickness; abutment height; stress distribution; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; RETAINED OVERDENTURES; MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; COMPOSITE-MATERIALS; ATTACHMENT TYPES; SYSTEMS; BALL; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1177/2280800019882645
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different heights of attachment and mucosa thicknesses on the stress distribution of two implant-retained mandibular overdenture designs under loading using the photoelastic stress analysis method. Materials and methods: Six photoelastic models of an edentulous mandibula were fabricated with two solitary implants that were placed in the canine regions. The attachment systems studied were ball and locator stud attachments. Both the ball and locator groups included three models that had different residual ridge heights so as to provide different mucosa thicknesses (1 mm-1 mm, 1 mm-2 mm, 1 mm-4 mm). A static vertical force of 135 N was applied unilaterally (each on the right then the left side) to the central fossa of the first molars. Models were positioned in the field of a circular polariscope to observe the distribution of isochromatic fringes around the implants and the interimplant areas under loading. The photoelastic stress fringes were monitored and recorded photographically. Results: The ball attachment groups showed higher stress values than did the locator groups under loading. Both attachment systems produced the lowest stress values in stimulated 1 mm-1 mm mucosa thickness models. The models with 1 mm-2 mm mucosa thicknesses showed higher stress values than did other models for both attachment systems. The highest stress value observed around both attachment systems was the moderate level in all test models. Conclusion: In different height mucosa thicknesses, locator attachment models distributed the load to the other side of the implant and its surrounding tissue, whereas the ball attachment did not. Regardless of mucosal thickness and attachment type, the implant on the loading side was subjected to the highest stress concentration.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Photoelastic Stress Analysis Surrounding Implant-Supported Prosthesis and Alveolar Ridge on Mandibular Overdentures
    da Silva, Dorival Pedroso
    Cazal, Claudia
    Sousa de Almeida, Fernanda Campos
    Brito e Dias, Reinaldo
    Ballester, Rafael Yaguee
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 2010
  • [2] Histological changes in edentulous oral mucosa under implant-supported overdentures
    Preti, G
    Bassi, F
    Barbero, P
    Lorenzetti, M
    Valente, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1996, 23 (10) : 651 - 654
  • [3] Immediate Versus Conventional Loading of Implant-Supported Maxillary Overdentures: A Finite Element Stress Analysis
    Akca, Kivanc
    Eser, Atilim
    Eckert, Steven
    Cavusoglu, Yeliz
    Cehreli, Murat Cavit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (02) : E57 - E63
  • [4] Photoelastic stress analysis of splinted and unitary implant-supported prostheses
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira
    Ribeiro Villa, Luiz Marcelo
    de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
    de Mello, Caroline Cantieri
    de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto
    Honrio, Heitor Marques
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSICS B-LASERS AND OPTICS, 2014, 117 (01): : 235 - 244
  • [5] Photoelastic stress analysis of splinted and unitary implant-supported prostheses
    Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
    Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior
    Luiz Marcelo Ribeiro Villa
    Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista
    Caroline Cantieri de Mello
    Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida
    Heitor Marques Honório
    [J]. Applied Physics B, 2014, 117 : 235 - 244
  • [6] Stress Analysis of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Denture with Anterior Fixed Prostheses and Conventional Implant-Supported Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible
    Ozel, Gulsum Sayin
    Ozyilmaz, Ozgun Yusuf
    Inan, Ozgur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ORAL RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [7] Finite element analysis of different loading conditions for implant-supported overdentures supported by conventional or mini implants
    Solberg, K.
    Heinemann, F.
    Pellikaan, P.
    Keilig, L.
    Stark, H.
    Bourauel, C.
    Hasan, I.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 20 (07) : 770 - 782
  • [8] Effect of implant number and distribution on load transfer in implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses for the anterior maxilla: A photoelastic stress analysis study
    Lee, Jae-In
    Lee, Yoon
    Kim, Yu-Lee
    Cho, Hye-Won
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (02): : 161 - 169
  • [9] Stress Distribution in Splinted and Unsplinted Implant-Supported Maxillary Overdentures: A 3D Finite Element Analysis
    Geramy, Allahyar
    Habibzadeh, Sareh
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [10] Loading Protocols for Implant-Supported Overdentures in the Edentulous Jaw: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Schimmel, Martin
    Srinivasan, Murali
    Herrmann, Francois R.
    Mueller, Frauke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 : 271 - 286