Second fertility-sparing surgery and fertility-outcomes in patients with recurrent borderline ovarian tumors

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Lifei [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Qin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Hongjing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, West China Second Univ Hosp, 20,Sect 3,Renmin South Rd, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Borderline ovarian tumors; Fertility sparing surgery; Radical surgery; Recurrence; Pregnancy outcome; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; RISK; SWEDEN; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-022-06431-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background At the time of recurrence, many borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) patients are still young with fertility needs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproductive outcomes and recurrence rate of second fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in women with recurrent BOTs. Methods Seventy-eight women of childbearing age diagnosed with recurrent BOTs from November 2009 to 2020 whose primary treatment was FSS were included. Results The FIGO stage I disease accounted for 46.2% and serous BOT accounted for 87.2% in the study group. Forty-seven patients underwent second FSS, and the remaining 31 underwent radical surgery (RS). Seventeen patients relapsed again after second surgery, but no malignant transformation and tumor-associated deaths were reported. Compared to FIGO stage I, the FIGO stage III tumors were more likely to relapse, but there was no statistical difference in pregnancy rate among patients with different stages. In the second FSS group, recurrence rate was higher in patients who underwent oophorocystectomy compared to patients with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO), but the pregnancy rate was similar. There was no significant difference in postoperative recurrence risk between USO and RS. The recurrence rate was not associated with operative route (laparoscopy or laparotomy), or lymphadenectomy, or postoperative chemotherapy. Among the 32 patients who tried to conceive, the pregnancy rate was 46.9% and live birth rate was 81.3%. Conclusion Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a safe procedure for FIGO stage I recurrent BOT patients with fertility needs, and can achieve a high postoperative pregnancy rate and live birth rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1183
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Second fertility-sparing surgery and fertility-outcomes in patients with recurrent borderline ovarian tumors
    Lifei Wang
    Qian Zhong
    Qin Tang
    Hongjing Wang
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 1177 - 1183
  • [2] FERTILITY-SPARING SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS AND REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES
    Helmut, P.
    Harter, P.
    Ataseven, B.
    Heitz, F.
    Prader, S.
    Schneider, S.
    Heikaus, S.
    Traut, A.
    du Bois, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A47 - A48
  • [3] Fertility-sparing surgery and reproductive-outcomes in patients with borderline ovarian tumors
    Plett, Helmut
    Harter, Philipp
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Heitz, Florian
    Prader, Sonia
    Schneider, Stephanie
    Heikaus, Sebastian
    Fisseler-Eckhoff, Annette
    Kommoss, Friedrich
    Lax, Sigurd F.
    Staebler, Annette
    Traut, Alexander
    du Bois, Andreas
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 157 (02) : 411 - 417
  • [4] Fertility preservation for women with borderline ovarian tumors: fertility-sparing surgery
    Kim, S. Samuel
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 115 (01) : 83 - 84
  • [5] FERTILITY-SPARING SURGERY (FSS) IN PATIENTS WITH BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS (BOT)
    Vdovichenko, N.
    Harter, P.
    Ataseven, B.
    Heitz, F.
    Prader, S.
    Schneider, S.
    Kurzeder, K.
    Heikaus, S.
    Weikel, W.
    Fisseler-Eckhoff, A.
    Traut, A.
    du Bois, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 1568 - 1568
  • [6] Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT)
    Vdovichenko, N.
    Ataseven, B.
    Heitz, F.
    Prader, S.
    Schneider, S.
    Kurzeder, C.
    Heikaus, S.
    Weikel, W.
    Fisseler-Eckhoff, A.
    Alexander, T.
    du Bois, A.
    [J]. ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 92 - 92
  • [7] Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Borderline Ovarian Tumors Oncologic Safety and Reproductive Outcomes
    Song, Taejong
    Choi, Chel Hun
    Park, Hwang Shin
    Kim, Min-Kyu
    Lee, Yoo-Young
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    Lee, Jeong-Won
    Bae, Duk-Soo
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2011, 21 (04) : 640 - 646
  • [8] Reproductive outcomes and fertility-sparing in women with Borderline ovarian tumors
    Uzan, C.
    Canlorbe, G.
    Chabbert-buffet, N.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I166 - I166
  • [9] Borderline ovarian tumors, fertility-sparing surgery and pregnancy outcome
    Frega, A.
    Coluccia, A. C.
    Di Martino, G.
    Catalano, A.
    Milazzo, G. N.
    Assorgi, C.
    Manzara, F.
    Romeo, G. D.
    Gentile, M.
    Marziani, R.
    Moscarini, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (02) : 281 - 284
  • [10] Pregnancy after fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors
    Lian, Chengying
    Chen, Xiujuan
    Ni, Yihua
    Huang, Xiaochen
    Lin, Yuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 134 (03) : 282 - 285