Strengthening protection of endemic wildlife threatened by the international pet trade: The case of the Australian shingleback lizard

被引:11
|
作者
Heinrich, S. [1 ,2 ]
Toomes, A. [1 ]
Shepherd, C. R. [2 ]
Stringham, O. C. [1 ,3 ]
Swan, M. [4 ]
Cassey, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Invas Sci & Wildlife Ecol Lab, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Monitor Conservat Res Soc Monitor, Big Lake Ranch, BC V0L 1G0, Canada
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Math Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Dept Biodivers Conservat & Attract, Kensington, WA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Australian endemic species; CITES Appendix III; EPBC; exotic pets; reptiles; Tiliqua rugosa; wildlife trade; pet trade; ILLEGAL TRADE; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; SLEEPY LIZARD; POPULATIONS; REPTILES; RARITY; IMPACT; LEGAL;
D O I
10.1111/acv.12721
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Unsustainable wildlife trade threatens an increasing number of species globally. Australia has a particularly rich and endemic herpetofauna, which is coveted on the international pet market. While Australia implements domestic protection of most of its native species, there is little to no regulation of international trade once live animals have been smuggled out of the country. This is a threat for a variety of rare, unique and/or range-restricted species, subspecies and locality morphs. One of these species is the shingleback lizard (Tiliqua rugosa). We compiled Australian seizure data and international online trade data pertaining to shinglebacks. We found all four subspecies in trade across Asia, Europe and North America. Here we provide evidence that all four shingleback subspecies are illegally extracted from the wild in Australia and smuggled to international destinations, where they are sold and distributed globally. While shinglebacks are a protected species in Australia and can only be exported legally under a federal permit, their import into, and trade between, other countries is often not illegal, even in the absence of such a permit. These contradictory legal frameworks apply to the majority of nationally protected native fauna and must be addressed by each importing country on an individual basis; that is, by changing their legislation to cover and protect species that are nationally protected in their native range. Meanwhile, however, we argue that listing T. rugosa in Appendix III of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora is a meaningful way to provide other countries with the legal means to confiscate illegally exported shinglebacks from Australia. Our findings and recommendations are directly relevant for potential future Appendix III consideration of other nationally protected species that are found in international trade.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Zoos consenting to the illegal wildlife trade - the earless monitor lizard as a case study
    Nijman, Vincent
    [J]. NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, 2021, (44): : 69 - 79
  • [2] Trade secrets and traditional knowledge: strengthening international protection of indigenous innovation
    Long, Doris Estelle
    [J]. LAW AND THEORY OF TRADE SECRECY: A HANDBOOK OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH, 2011, : 495 - 536
  • [3] Domesticating the Exotic? An Online Survey of Attitudes towards the International Wildlife Pet Trade
    Contina, Andrea
    Anderson, Christopher E.
    Hille, David C.
    Oakley, William F.
    Bridge, Eli S.
    Kelly, Jeffrey F.
    Smith, Haley O.
    Koch, Jennifer
    Jervis, Lori L.
    [J]. CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2021, 19 (03): : 184 - 189
  • [4] TRADE PROTECTION AS AN INTERNATIONAL COMMODITY - THE CASE OF STEEL
    YEAGER, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1980, 40 (01): : 33 - 44
  • [5] Strengthening International Legal Cooperation to Combat the Illegal Wildlife Trade Between Southeast Asia and China
    Jiao, Yunbo
    Yeophantong, Pichamon
    Lee, Tien Ming
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 9
  • [6] Left hung out to dry: How inadequate international protection can fuel trade in endemic species - The case of the earless monitor
    Janssen, Jordi
    Krishnasamy, Kanitha
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 16
  • [7] 'Do you come from a land down under?' Characteristics of the international trade in Australian endemic parrots
    Vall-Ilosera, Miguel
    Cassey, Phillip
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 207 : 38 - 46
  • [8] Should endemic and threatened freshwater ornamental fishes of Kerala part of the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot be captive bred for international trade?
    Raghavan, Rajeev
    Tlusty, Michael
    Prasad, G.
    Pereira, Benno
    Ali, Anvar
    Sujarittanonta, Lavanchawee
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2007, 93 (09): : 1211 - 1213
  • [9] International wildlife trade, avian influenza, organised crime and the effectiveness of CITES: The Chinese hwamei as a case study
    Shepherd, Chris R.
    Leupen, Boyd T. C.
    Siriwat, Penthai
    Nijman, Vincent
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 23