Validating a two-dimensional bipolar spectrum model integrating DSM-5's mixed features specifier for Major Depressive Disorder

被引:9
|
作者
Ferentinos, Panagiotis [1 ,2 ]
Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N. [3 ]
Lewis, Cathryn M. [2 ]
Porichi, Evgenia [1 ]
Dikeos, Dimitris [4 ]
Papageorgiou, Charalambos [4 ]
Douzenis, Athanassios [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Attikon Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat 2, 1 Rimini str, Athens 12462, Greece
[2] Social Genet & Dev Psychiat Ctr, lnst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat 3, Thessaloniki, Greece
[4] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Eginit Hosp, Dept Psychiat 1, Athens, Greece
关键词
DIAGNOSTIC VALIDITY; II DISORDER; TEMPS-A; RATING-SCALE; DOUBLE-BLIND; TEMPERAMENT; EPISODE; PREVALENCE; STATE; MONOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.06.007
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Introduction: The literature on DSM-5's 'Major Depressive Disorder with lifetime mixed features' (MDD-MF) is limited. This study investigated MDD-MF's potential inclusion into a bipolar spectrum. Methods: We recruited 287 patients with Bipolar I disorder (BD-I), BD-II, MDD-MF or 'MDD without lifetime mixed features' (MDD-noMF); most (N = 280) were stabilized for at least one year on medication. Sixteen validators (clinical features, psychiatric family history, temperament, stabilizing treatment) were compared across groups and subjected to trend analyses. Two discriminant function analyses (DFA; primary and secondary), excluding or including, respectively, treatment-related predictors, explored latent dimensions maximizing between group discrimination; mahalanobis distances between group 'centroids' were calculated. Results: Eleven validators differed significantly across groups; nine varied monotonically along a bipolar diathesis gradient with significant linear trends; two peaked at MDD-MF and displayed significant quadratic trends. In the primary DFA, apart from a classic bipolarity dimension, correlating with hospitalizations, early age at onset, lifetime psychosis and lower anxious temperament scores, on which groups ranked along a bipolar propensity gradient, a second dimension was also significant, peaking at BD-II and MDD-F (challenging the classic bipolar ranking), which correlated with lifetime psychiatric comorbidities, suicidality, lower lifetime psychosis rates, female gender, higher cyclothymic and lower depressive temperament scores; MDD-MF was equipoised amidst BD-II and MDD-noMF. After including treatment related predictors (secondary DFA), discrimination improved overall but BD-II and MDD-MF were closest than any other pair, suggesting similar treatment patterns for these two groups at this naturalistic setting. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first time a two-dimensional bipolar spectrum based on classic external validators is proposed, fitting the data better than a unidimensional model. Additional predictors are warranted to improve BD-II/MDD-MF discrimination. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 99
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Validating DSM-5 'major depressive disorder with mixed features' within the bipolar spectrum
    Ferentinos, P.
    Dikeos, D.
    Fountoulakis, K.
    Porichi, E.
    Papageorgiou, C.
    Douzenis, A.
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2016, 18 : 130 - 130
  • [3] Measures of the DSM-5 mixed-features specifier of major depressive disorder
    Zimmerman, Mark
    [J]. CNS SPECTRUMS, 2017, 22 (02) : 196 - 202
  • [4] A clinically useful self-report measure of the DSM-5 mixed features specifier of major depressive disorder
    Zimmerman, Mark
    Chelminski, Iwona
    Young, Diane
    Dalrymple, Kristy
    Martinez, Jennifer H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2014, 168 : 357 - 362
  • [5] Validity of the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier for major depressive disorder
    Zimmerman, Mark
    Martin, Jacob
    McGonigal, Patrick
    Harris, Lauren
    Kerr, Sophie
    Balling, Caroline
    Kiefer, Reina
    Stanton, Kasey
    Dalrymple, Kristy
    [J]. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2019, 36 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [6] Evaluating the prevalence and illness characteristics of the new DSM-5-defined "mixed features specifier" in adults with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder
    McIntyre, R. S.
    Cha, D. S.
    Soczynska, J.
    Gallaugher, A.
    Kennedy, S.
    Woldeyohannes, H.
    Muzina, D.
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2013, 15 : 64 - 64
  • [8] The predictive effect of the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier on treatment outcomes in persons with major depressive disorder
    Gaspersz, R.
    Lamers, F.
    Kent, J.
    Beekman, A.
    Smit, J.
    van Hemert, A.
    Schoevers, R.
    Penninx, B.
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2016, 18 : 88 - 88
  • [9] In light of the DSM-5 dimensional model of personality: Borderline personality disorder at the crossroads with the bipolar spectrum
    Henriques-Calado, Joana
    Goncalves, Bruno
    Marques, Catarina
    Paulino, Marco
    Gama Marques, Joao
    Gracio, Jaime
    Pires, Rute
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 294 : 897 - 907
  • [10] A Clinically Useful Self-Report Measure of the DSM-5 Anxious Distress Specifier for Major Depressive Disorder
    Zimmerman, Mark
    Chelminski, Iwona
    Young, Diane
    Dalrymple, Kristy
    Walsh, Emily
    Rosenstein, Lia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 75 (06) : 601 - 607