Welfare and performance of sows and piglets in farrowing pens with temporary crating system on a Spanish commercial farm

被引:8
|
作者
Ko, Heng-Lun [1 ]
Temple, Deborah [1 ]
Hales, Janni [2 ]
Manteca, Xavier [1 ]
Llonch, Pol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Sch Vet Sci, Dept Anim & Food Sci, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[2] SKIOLD JYDEN AS, Idomvej 2, DK-7570 Vemb, Denmark
关键词
Crushing; Farrowing system; Maternal behavior; Mother-young interaction; Stress biomarker; Temporary crating; CHROMOGRANIN-A; LACTATING SOWS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; HYPERPROLIFIC SOWS; MATERNAL-BEHAVIOR; POSTURAL CHANGES; RISK-FACTORS; CRATES; MORTALITY; CONFINEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105527
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The study aimed to compare the welfare and performance of sows and piglets in three different farrowing systems (farrowing crate (FC) and farrowing pen with temporary crating (TC): SWAP and JLF15). One batch of crossbred Duroc was followed in every season. There were 18 sows (183 piglets) in FC, 23 sows (243 piglets) in SWAP, and 23 sows (237 piglets) in JLF15. Farrowing day was Day (D) 0 and weaning occurred on D24. Crating period was from entry to weaning in FC, and from 1-day pre-expected farrowing day to D3 in TC. Social interactions between littermates, between sows and piglets, and exploration by sows and piglets were observed on D2, D4, D12, and D23. Video recordings of crushing events which led to piglets' death were studied. Piglets were weighed on D3 and D19, and foreleg abrasions were assessed on D19. Sow saliva samples were collected on 1 day before and after temporary confinement, D2, D4, D12, and D23 to evaluate cortisol (CORT) and chromogranin A (CgA) levels. TC piglets initiated naso-naso contacts with sows more frequently than FC on D2 (P <= 0.01). TC sows interacted with piglets more frequently than FC on D12 (P <= 0.05). TC sows explored the pens more frequently than FC on D4 (P <= 0.05). Crushing rate (i.e. number of piglets per sow) of SWAP (1.2 +/- 0.3) was higher than those of JLF15 (0.6 +/- 0.2) and FC (0.3 +/- 0.1) (P < 0.02), and crushing rate of JLF15 was higher than that of FC (P < 0.0001). Autumn batch showed the lowest crushing rate amongst different batches (P < 0.001). Number of crushing incidents was similar when TC sows were crated or loose (P = 0.54). The percentage of occasions when sows used a support from the pen when changing posture but still crushed the piglets was higher in FC than in TC (P = 0.05). No difference of growth and foreleg abrasion in piglets were found between systems. CORT in SWAP peaked on D2 (P = 0.02), and CgA in JLF15 peaked on D4 and remained elevated on D12 (P <= 0.05). CORT and CgA in FC remained similar during lactation. Our results suggested that TC facilitated mother young interactions; TC showed a higher crushing rate; sows changed their posture differently between systems and batches; the practice of temporary crating did not alter the level of stress biomarkers in sows.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Observations of sows and piglets housed in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial farm
    Chidgey, Kirsty L.
    Morel, Patrick C. H.
    Stafford, Kevin J.
    Barugh, Ian W.
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2016, 176 : 12 - 18
  • [2] Welfare and Performance of Post-Weaning Sows and Piglets Previously Housed in Farrowing Pens with Temporary Crating on a Spanish Commercial Farm: A Pilot Study
    Ko, Heng-Lun
    Temple, Deborah
    Hales, Janni
    Manteca, Xavier
    Llonch, Pol
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [3] Observations of sows and piglets housed in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial farm (vol 176, pg 12, 2016)
    Chidgey, Kirsty L.
    Morel, Patrick C. H.
    Stafford, Kevin J.
    Barugh, Ian W.
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2016, 179 : 103 - 103
  • [4] Effect of alternative farrowing pens with temporary crating on the performance of lactating sows and their litters
    Cheon, Si Nae
    Jeong, So Hee
    Yoo, Guem Zoo
    Lim, Se Jin
    Kim, Chan Ho
    Jang, Gul Won
    Jeon, Jung Hwan
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 64 (03) : 574 - 587
  • [5] Sow and piglet productivity and sow reproductive performance in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial New Zealand pig farm
    Chidgey, Kirsty L.
    Morel, Patrick C. H.
    Stafford, Kevin J.
    Barugh, Ian W.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2015, 173 : 87 - 94
  • [6] The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens
    Singh, C.
    Verdon, M.
    Cronin, G. M.
    Hemsworth, P. H.
    ANIMAL, 2017, 11 (07) : 1210 - 1221
  • [7] Review of Temporary Crating of Farrowing and Lactating Sows
    Goumon, Sebastien
    Illmann, Gudrun
    Moustsen, Vivi A.
    Baxter, Emma M.
    Edwards, Sandra A.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [8] Sow and piglet behavioral associations in farrowing pens with temporary crating and in farrowing crates
    Chidgey, Kirsty L.
    Morel, Patrick C. H.
    Stafford, Kevin J.
    Barugh, Ian W.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2017, 20 : 91 - 101
  • [9] Effects of free farrowing system on the productive performance and welfare of sows and piglets
    Sanchez-Salcedo, Jose A.
    Yanez-Pizana, Ariadna
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2024, 27 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Dynamics of Sows' Activity Housed in Farrowing Pens with Possibility of Temporary Crating might Indicate the Time When Sows Should be Confined in a Crate before the Onset of Farrowing
    Oczak, Maciej
    Maschat, Kristina
    Baumgartner, Johannes
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (01):