Pain Assessment Using the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in Chinese Critically Ill Ventilated Adults

被引:35
|
作者
Li, Qingdong [1 ,3 ]
Wan, Xianyao [1 ,3 ]
Gu, Chunmei [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Yang [4 ]
Huang, Wei [1 ,3 ]
Li, Suwei [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yongli [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Crit Care Med, Dalian 116011, Liao Ning Provi, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Nursing, Dalian 116011, Liao Ning Provi, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Med Univ, Crit Care Med Res Inst, Dalian 116011, Liao Ning Provi, Peoples R China
[4] Dalian Med Univ, Dept English Educ, Dalian 116011, Liao Ning Provi, Peoples R China
关键词
Pain assessment; ventilation; intensive care unit; critical care; psychometrics; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.014
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. The psychometric properties of the Critical- Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) need to be tested in general intensive care unit patient populations in China. Objectives. To further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPOT and provide a pain assessment method for Chinese critically ill ventilated adults by validating a translation of the CPOT. Methods. A total of 63 conscious ventilated Chinese adults were repeatedly assessed by two independent raters using the CPOT at rest as well as before and during the two procedures: 1) nociceptive procedure (turning) and 2) non-nociceptive procedure (taking noninvasive blood pressure). A total of 12 assessments were included. Results. The principal component factor analysis revealed that the domain structure of the CPOT was acceptable. Cronbach's alpha coefficient as a measure for the internal consistency ranged from 0.57 to 0.86; intraclass correlation coefficients as a measure for inter- rater reliability ranged from 0.80 to 0.91; Spearman nonparametric coefficients as a measure for test- retest reliability ranged from 0.81 to 0.93. The CPOT total score was significantly higher during the nociceptive procedure, indicating that its discriminant validity was good. Self-reported pain was obtained as the gold standard; the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the best cutoff value of the CPOT (>2) with the specificity (73.3-81.8%) and sensitivity (80.8-89.4%) as well as the area under the curve (range 0.849-0.902). Conclusion. The CPOT has good psychometric properties and can be used as a reliable and valid instrument for pain assessment in Chinese critically ill ventilated adults. (C) 2014 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 982
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pain assessment in the critically ill ventilated adult:: Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool and physiologic indicators
    Gelinas, Celine
    Johnston, Celeste
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 23 (06): : 497 - 505
  • [2] CRITICAL-CARE PAIN OBSERVATION TOOL IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    [J]. DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2014, 33 (05) : 261 - 261
  • [3] Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
    Rijkenberg, S.
    Stilma, W.
    Endeman, H.
    Bosman, R. J.
    Oudemans-van Straaten, H. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 30 (01) : 167 - 172
  • [4] Comparison between Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and physiologic indicators for pain assessment in the critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients
    Khanna, Puneet
    Pandey, Ravinder Kumar
    Chandralekha, Chandralekha
    Sharma, Ankur
    Pangasa, Neha
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 12 (03) : 384 - 388
  • [5] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults
    Joffe, Aaron M.
    McNulty, Bridgett
    Boitor, Madalina
    Marsh, Rebekah
    Gelinas, Celine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 36 : 76 - 80
  • [6] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in Adult Critically Ill Patients
    Buttes, Paul
    Keal, Ginger
    Cronin, Sherill Nones
    Stocks, Laurel
    Stout, Cheryl
    [J]. DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2014, 33 (02) : 78 - 81
  • [7] Validation of The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for the detection of oral-pharyngeal pain in critically ill adults
    Dale, Craig M.
    Prendergast, Virginia
    Gelinas, Celine
    Rose, Louise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 48 : 334 - 338
  • [8] The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults A prospective validation study
    Kiesewetter, I.
    Bartels, U.
    Bauer, A.
    Schneider, G.
    Pilge, S.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 2019, 68 (12): : 836 - 842
  • [9] Pain Assessment in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Validity and Reliability Research of the Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
    Gundogan, Onur
    Bor, Canan
    Korhan, Esra Akin
    Demirag, Kubilay
    Uyar, Mehmet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF INTENSIVE CARE-TURK YOGUN BAKM DERNEGI DERGISI, 2016, 14 (03): : 93 - 99
  • [10] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool with the Seriously Ill
    Ross, Melody
    Boitor, Madalina
    Gelinas, Celine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : E129 - E129