Borderline Glenoid Bone Defect in Anterior Shoulder Instability Latarjet Procedure Versus Bankart Repair

Background: The optimal procedure for anterior shoulder instability with a borderline (15%-20%) bone defect on the anterior rim of the glenoid is still controversial. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure among patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and a borderline glenoid bone defect. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed cases of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a borderline (15%-20%) glenoid bone defect. Enrollment comprised 149 patients (Bankart group, n = 118; Latarjet group, n = 31). The mean follow-up and age at operation were 28.9 +/- 7.3 months (range, 24-73 months) and 26 +/- 5 years (range, 16-46 years), respectively. Results: Rowe and UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) shoulder scores significantly improved from 42.0 +/- 14.3 and 22.9 +/- 3.2 preoperatively to 90.9 +/- 15.4 and 32.5 +/- 3.3 postoperatively in the Bankart group (P < .001) and from 41.0 +/- 17.9 and 22.3 +/- 3.4 to 91.1 +/- 16.1 and 32.3 +/- 3.4 in the Latarjet group (P < .001), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in Rowe (P = .920) or UCLA (P = .715) scores at the final follow-up. Mean postoperative loss of motion during forward flexion, external rotation in abduction, and internal rotation to the posterior was 3.0 degrees +/- 6.2 degrees, 11.6 degrees +/- 10.2 degrees, and 0.6 spinal segment in the Bankart group and 3.7 degrees +/- 9.8 degrees, 10.3 degrees +/- 12.8 degrees, and 0.9 spinal segment in the Latarjet group, respectively. These differences were not significant. However, the loss of external rotation at the side was significantly greater in the Bankart group (13.3 degrees +/- 12.9 degrees) than in the Latarjet group (7.3 degrees +/- 18.1 degrees, P = .034). The overall recurrence rate was significantly higher in the Bankart group (22.9%) than in the Latarjet group (6.5%), (P = .040). Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure and arthroscopic Bankart repair both provided satisfactory clinical outcome scores and pain relief for anterior shoulder instability with a borderline glenoid bone defect. However, the Latarjet procedure resulted in significantly lower recurrences and less external rotation limitation than the arthroscopic Bankart repair. Therefore, the Latarjet procedure could be a more reliable surgical option in anterior recurrent instability with a borderline glenoid bone defect.