Assessment of test method variables for in vitro skin irritation testing of medical device extracts

被引:12
|
作者
Olsen, Daniel S. [1 ]
Lee, Michelle [1 ]
Turley, Audrey P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nelson Labs LLC, Salt Lake City, UT 84123 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Medical devices; Irritation; Alternative testing; In vitro; Reconstructed human epidermis;
D O I
10.1016/j.tiv.2017.11.012
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Skin irritation is an important component of the biological safety evaluation of medical devices. This testing has typically been performed using in vivo models. However, in an effort to reduce the need for in vivo testing, alternative methods for assessing skin irritation potential in vitro have been developed using a Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) model. During the development of the protocol for the round robin validation of in vitro irritation testing for medical device extracts, it became clear that there were three points in the procedure where different options may be validated within each laboratory for routine testing: sample exposure time (18 vs 24 h), SDS positive control concentration, and cytokine (IL-1 alpha) release testing. The goal of our study was to evaluate the effect of these variables. EpiDerm (TM) tissues were exposed to extracts of three plain polymer samples, and four polymers embedded with known irritant chemicals. Exposures were performed for 18 and 24 h. Resulting tissue viability was assessed by MIT reduction and IL-1 alpha release was assessed by ELISA. Testing was also performed using various concentrations of SDS ranging from 0.5 to 1% (w/v). Overall, results were similar for samples tested and 18 and 24 h, but the 18 h exposure time has the potential to have an impact on the results of some sample types. IL-1 alpha testing was shown to be useful to clarify conflicting tissue viability results. Use of a lower concentration of SDS as a positive control can help prevent issues that arise from excessive tissue damage often caused by 1% SDS.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro human skin irritation test for evaluation of medical device extracts
    Casas, J. W.
    Lewerenz, G. M.
    Rankin, E. A.
    Willoughby, J. A., Sr.
    Blakeman, L. C.
    McKim, J. M., Jr.
    Coleman, K. P.
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2013, 27 (08) : 2175 - 2183
  • [2] SkinEthic™ RHE for in vitro evaluation of skin irritation of medical device extracts
    Pellevoisin, Christian
    Videau, Christelle
    Briotet, Damien
    Gregoire, Corinne
    Tornier, Carine
    Alonso, Main
    Rigaudeau, Anne Sophie
    Bouez, Charbel
    Seyler, Nathalie
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2018, 50 : 418 - 425
  • [3] Round Robin Study for Evaluation an in vitro skin irritation test for medical device extracts using KeraSkinTM TM in Korea
    Kim, Joohwan
    Kang, Nam-Hee
    Kim, Jin Sik
    Kim, Il Soo
    Kim, Younhee
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2024, 192
  • [4] In Vitro Skin Irritation Testing: Improving the Sensitivity of the EpiDerm Skin Irritation Test Protocol
    Kandarova, Helena
    Hayden, Patrick
    Klausner, Mitch
    Kubilus, Joseph
    Kearney, Paul
    Sheasgreen, John
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2009, 37 (06): : 671 - 689
  • [5] In vitro assessment of medical device extracts potential to produce skin sensitization
    Cottrez, F.
    Pellevoisin, C.
    Coleman, K.
    Groux, H.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 295 : S179 - S179
  • [6] Integrated test approach for in vitro skin irritation and sensitization testing
    Gehrke, H.
    Lehmeier, D.
    Stiller, S.
    Hofman-Huether, H.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 238 (02) : S190 - S190
  • [7] Applicability domain of the GARD®skin Medical Device test for in vitro skin sensitization testing of medical devices
    Jenvert, R. -M.
    Brown, R.
    Johansson, H.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2021, 350 : S92 - S92
  • [8] Round robin study to evaluate the reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) model as an in vitro skin irritation test for detection of irritant activity in medical device extracts
    De Jong, Wim H.
    Hoffmann, Sebastian
    Lee, Michelle
    Kandarova, Helena
    Pellevoisin, Christian
    Haishima, Yuji
    Rollins, Beau
    Zdawczyk, Austin
    Willoughby, Jamin
    Bachelor, Michael
    Schatz, Timothy
    Skoog, Shelby
    Parker, Sherry
    Sawyer, Anita
    Pescio, Paolo
    Fant, Kristina
    Kim, Kwang-Mahn
    Kwon, Jae Sung
    Gehrke, Helge
    Hofman-Huether, Hana
    Meloni, Marisa
    Julius, Conrad
    Briotet, Damien
    Letasiova, Silvia
    Kato, Reiko
    Miyajima, Atsuko
    De La Fonteynea, Liset J. J.
    Videau, Christelle
    Tornier, Carine
    Turley, Audrey P.
    Christiano, Nicholas
    Rollins, Thor S.
    Coleman, Kelly P.
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2018, 50 : 439 - 449
  • [9] The suitability of reconstructed human epidermis models for medical device irritation assessment: A comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo testing results
    De Jong, Wim H.
    Carraway, Joseph W.
    Liu, Chenghu
    Fan, Chunguang
    Liu, Jia
    Turley, Audrey P.
    Rollins, Thor S.
    Coleman, Kelly P.
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2020, 69
  • [10] In vitro skin irritation assessment becomes a reality in China using a reconstructed human epidermis test method
    Li, Nan
    Liu, Yanfeng
    Qiu, Jie
    Zhong, Lingyan
    Alepee, Nathalie
    Cotovio, Jose
    Cai, Zhenzi
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2017, 41 : 159 - 167