Development and validation of a predictive model for determining clinically significant prostate cancer in men with negative magnetic resonance imaging after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Zhu, Yuze [1 ]
Yao, Zichuan [2 ]
Jiang, Yunzhong [2 ]
Wu, Bin [1 ]
Bai, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shengjing Hosp, 36 SanHao St, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Shengjing Hosp, Shenyang, Peoples R China
来源
PROSTATE | 2021年 / 81卷 / 13期
关键词
biopsy; negative MRI; nomogram; prostate cancer; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; ANTIGEN PSA DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; HYPERPLASIA; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The interpretation of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening results for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology grade >= group 2) is debatable and poses a clinical dilemma for urologists. No nomograms have been developed to predict csPCa in such populations. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a model for predicting the probability of csPCa in men with negative MRI (PI-RADS score 1-2) results after transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Methods The development cohort consisted of 728 patients with negative MRI results who underwent subsequent prostate biopsy at our center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017. The patients' clinicopathologic data were recorded. The Lasso regression was used for data dimension reduction and feature selection, then multivariable binary logistic regression was used to build a predictive model with regression coefficients. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 334 consecutive patients from January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. The performance of the predictive model was assessed with respect to discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results The predictors incorporated in this model included age, history of previous negative prostate biopsy, prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), and lower urinary tract symptoms, with PSAD being the strongest predictor. The model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.875 (95% confidence interval, 0.816-0.933) and good calibration (unreliability test, p = .540). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model was clinically useful. Conclusion This study presents a good nomogram that can aid pre-biopsy risk stratification for the detection of csPCa, and that may help inform biopsy decisions in patients with negative MRI results.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 991
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [2] Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-guided Target Biopsy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Kurokawa, Gaku
    Mori, Keiichiro
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Nakano, Juria
    Takahashi, Yusuke
    Iwatani, Kosuke
    Urabe, Fumihiko
    Tsuzuki, Shunsuke
    Koike, Yusuke
    Sato, Shun
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    Miki, Kenta
    Kimura, Takahiro
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (02) : 679 - 686
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Hsin-Kai
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2021, 29 (02) : 75 - 76
  • [4] Re: Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Reply
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (06): : 1888 - 1889
  • [5] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy EDITORIAL COMMENTS
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Kuru, Timur H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1754 - 1754
  • [6] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy: a comparison with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Silecchia, G.
    Falagario, U.
    Sanguedolce, F.
    Macarini, L.
    Autorino, R.
    Cormio, L.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2018, 66 (04): : 200 - 204
  • [7] Detection Rate of Prostate Cancer in Repeat Biopsy after an Initial Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Huber, Ann-Kathrin
    Linz, Tim
    Schwab, Constantin
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Goertz, Lukas
    Bonekamp, David
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (10)
  • [8] Environmental Impact of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Thiel, Cassandra L.
    Gordon, Ilyssa O.
    Nolte, Adam C.
    Perecman, Aaron
    Loeb, Stacy
    Overcash, Michael
    Sherman, Jodi D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (05) : 463 - 471
  • [10] Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: Systematic and/or magnetic-resonance imaging-targeted
    Bladou, Franck
    Fogaing, Cora
    Levental, Mark
    Aronson, Samuel
    Alameldin, Mona
    Anidjar, Maurice
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (09): : E330 - E337