Care delivery in youth with type 2 diabetes - are we meeting clinical practice guidelines?

被引:8
|
作者
Amed, Shazhan [1 ,2 ]
Nuernberger, Kimberly [3 ]
Reimer, Kim [4 ]
Krueger, Hans [5 ,6 ]
Aydede, Sema K. [6 ,7 ]
Ayers, Dieter [7 ]
Collet, Jean-Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pediat, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
[2] British Columbia Childrens Hosp, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
[3] Blue Thorn Res & Anal Grp, Victoria, BC, Canada
[4] British Columbia Minist Hlth, Victoria, BC, Canada
[5] H Kruger & Associates Inc, Delta, BC, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[7] Prov Hlth Serv Author, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
children; clinical practice guidelines; quality of care; type; 2; diabetes; youth; QUALITY-OF-CARE; UNITED-STATES; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; CHILDREN; ASSOCIATION; ADOLESCENTS; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL; VALIDATION; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1111/pedi.12147
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies indicate high rates of treatment failure and early onset diabetes-related complications in youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aim to describe the quality of care provided to children and youth with T2D. Methods: This prospective cohort study used administrative datasets to describe individuals aged 10-24 yr diagnosed with T2D at < 20 yr of age (488 individuals; 2111 person-years). The primary outcome was being 'at goal' for adherence to Canadian clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). This was defined as having either optimal [three diabetes-related physician visits/year, three hemoglobin A1C (A1C) tests/year, and all recommended screening tests for complications (i. e., retinopathy, nephropathy)] or good (two diabetes-related physician visits/year, two A1C tests/year, and at least two screening tests) adherence to CPGs. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression modeling were used. Results: Sixty eight percentage person-years had poor adherence to CPGs (< 2 physician visits and A1c tests/year and no screening tests). Only 29% and 25% were at goal for adherence in the 15-19 and 20-24 yr age groups, respectively. There was a 52% decreased odds of being at goal for adherence 4 yr after diagnosis of T2D (p< 0.001). For every year increase in age at diagnosis, there was a 5% decreased odds of being at goal (p= 0.04). Conclusions: Youth with T2D are not receiving high quality care, and older youth and young adults are particularly at risk. Future research is needed to understand the effectiveness of care in the context of poor adherence as well as patient, physician, and health system factors that might improve adherence.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Type 2 Diabetes in the Pediatric Population: Are We Meeting ADA Clinical Guidelines in Ohio?
    Valent, David
    Pestak, Katie
    Otis, Megan
    Shubrook, Jay
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2010, 49 (04) : 316 - 322
  • [2] ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth
    Zeitler, Phillip
    Arslanian, Silva
    Fu, Junfen
    Pinhas-Hamiel, Orit
    Reinehr, Thomas
    Tandon, Nikhil
    Urakami, Tatsuhiko
    Wong, Jencia
    Maahs, David M.
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2018, 19 : 28 - 46
  • [3] 2011 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes in Korea
    Ko, Seung-Hyun
    Kim, Sung-Rea
    Kim, Dong-Joon
    Oh, Seung-Joon
    Lee, Hye-Jin
    Shim, Kang-Hee
    Woo, Mi-Hye
    Kim, Jun-Young
    Kim, Nan-Hee
    Kim, Jae-Taik
    Kim, Chong Hwa
    Kim, Hae Jin
    Jeong, In-Kyung
    Hong, Eun-Kyung
    Cho, Jae-Hyoung
    Mok, Ji-Oh
    Yoon, Kun-Ho
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2011, 35 (05) : 431 - 436
  • [4] GUIDELINES VS PRACTICE IN THE DELIVERY OF DIABETES NUTRITION CARE
    ARNOLD, MS
    STEPIEN, CJ
    HESS, GE
    HISS, RG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1993, 93 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [5] Are we meeting the ISPAD 2022 clinical practice consensus guidelines regarding management of children with type 1 diabetes and celiac disease?
    Raicevic, M.
    Rosanio, F.
    Dos Santos, T. J.
    Chobot, A.
    Piona, C.
    Cudizio, L.
    Dumic, K.
    Shaunak, M.
    Aftab, S.
    Alsaffar, H.
    Mozillo, E.
    Vukovic, R.
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2024, 97 : 114 - 115
  • [6] Do we correctly follow type 2 diabetes mellitus therapeutic guidelines in daily clinical practice?
    Calderon, A.
    Barrios, V.
    Romero, G.
    Perez, V.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2007, 50 : S426 - S426
  • [7] ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care to children and adolescents with diabetes
    Pihoker, Catherine
    Forsander, Gun
    Fantahun, Bereket
    Virmani, Anju
    Corathers, Sarah
    Benitez-Aguirre, Paul
    Fu, Junfen
    Maahs, David M.
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2018, 19 : 84 - 104
  • [8] ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care to children and adolescents with diabetes
    Limbert, Catarina
    Tinti, Davide
    Malik, Faisal
    Kosteria, Ioanna
    Messer, Laurel
    Jalaludin, Muhammad Yazid
    Benitez-Aguirre, Paul
    Biester, Sarah
    Corathers, Sarah
    von Sengbusch, Simone
    Marcovecchio, M. Loredana
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2022, 23 (08) : 1243 - 1269
  • [9] Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus Assessment of type 2 diabetes mellitus guidelines
    Koc, E. Meltem
    Aksoy, Hilal
    Baser, Duygu Ayhan
    Artantas, Aylin Baydar
    Kahveci, Rabia
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 152 : 119 - 124
  • [10] Guidelines for diabetes care: Type 2 diabetes
    Schatz, H
    Voigt, KH
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 1999, 107 (07) : 389 - 389