Site-Specific Dynamic Analysis: 1-D versus 2-D

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Jianchao [1 ]
Qubain, Bashar S. [1 ]
机构
[1] GeoStructures Inc, 1000 West 9th Ave, King Of Prussia, PA 19406 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
When the subsurface profile at a given site cannot be simplified as horizontal layers or the depth to bedrock varies across the profile, validation of a typical 1-D soil column analysis is desirable in calculating the site-specific response spectrum. This point is illustrated through a detailed analysis of a multi-story building project site underlain by very soft marine clay deposits. The subsurface profile and the corresponding dynamic soil parameters are determined through field exploration, geophysical testing, and laboratory testing. Consequently, a 2-D dynamic finite element analysis is performed to provide insight into the effects of a sloping rock. The results indicate that the short period response across the sloping rock is substantially magnified in the 2-D analysis. The 1-D soil column underestimates the short period amplification factor of the spectral acceleration Fa while the 1-sec period amplification factor F-v generally increases with the thicker soil profile. The boundary effects of a 2-D analysis are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 204
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 1-D versus 2-D in DB at ECVP
    Carey, D. P.
    Sahraie, A.
    Trevethan, C. T.
    Weiskrantz, L.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2006, 35 : 231 - 231
  • [2] 1-D and 2-D Magnetostrictive Actuators
    Park, Young-Woo
    Noh, Myounggyu D.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2019, 55 (07)
  • [3] Site effect evaluation in Sellano (Italy) by 1-D and 2-D numerical analyses
    Capilleri, P
    Lanzo, G
    Maugeri, M
    Pagliaroli, A
    [J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures V, 2005, 81 : 73 - 82
  • [4] MODELS OF LATE-TYPE DISK GALAXIES: 1-D VERSUS 2-D
    Mineikis, T.
    Vansevicius, V.
    [J]. BALTIC ASTRONOMY, 2014, 23 (3-4) : 221 - 229
  • [5] DESIGN OF 1-D AND 2-D IIR EIGENFILTERS
    PEI, SC
    SHYU, JJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1994, 42 (04) : 962 - 966
  • [6] δ-WAVE FOR 1-D AND 2-D HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS
    S.L. Yang(Institute of Applied Mathematics
    [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 1996, (03) : 256 - 262
  • [7] 1-D AND 2-D ALGORITHMS FOR ORTHOGONAL TRANSFORMATIONS
    CORINTHIOS, MJ
    GEADAH, Y
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 1985, 27 (5-6) : 441 - 452
  • [8] COMPARISON OF 1-D AND 2-D AIRCRAFT IMAGES
    KANG, B
    STEINBERG, BD
    KESLER, SB
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ///, 1989, : 525 - 528
  • [9] Binocular disparities of 1-D and 2-D contours
    Farell, B
    Ahuja, S
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 1307 - 1307
  • [10] Analysis and VLSI architecture for 1-D and 2-D discrete wavelet transform
    Huang, CT
    Tseng, PC
    Chen, LG
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2005, 53 (04) : 1575 - 1586