Systematic reviews in five steps: III. Assessing the quality of the literature

被引：1
|
作者：
Khan, K. S. [1 ,2 ]
Cavanillas, A. Bueno [1 ,2 ]
Zamora, J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Granada, Spain
[2] CIBER Epidemiologla & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Unidad Bioestadist ClIn, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Metab & Syst Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源：
MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN | 2022年 / 48卷 / 07期
关键词：
Systematic review; Risk of bias; Checklist; Quality assessment; Heterogeneity;
D O I：
10.1016/j.semerg.2022.05.001
中图分类号：
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号：
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要：
Study quality assessment plays a key role in every step of the process when conducting a systematic review. Checklists are used to perform an accurate quality assessment. They include generic questions relevant to the design of the studies included in the review. The checklist items can be modified in relation to the question-specific components related to participants, interventions and outcomes. Quality assessment is used to describe the selected studies, explain heterogeneity, decide on the feasibility of undertaking a meta-analysis, assess the strength of the collated evidence, and make recommendations for future research. (c) 2022 Sociedad Espanola de M ' edicos de Atenci ' on Primaria (SEMERGEN). Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic reviews in five steps: II. Identifying relevant literature
    Khan, K. S.
    Bueno-Cavanillas, A.
    Zamora, J.
    [J]. MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2022, 48 (06): : 431 - 436
  • [2] Systematic reviews of the literature: steps for preparation
    Galvao, Tais Freire
    Pereira, Mauricio Gomes
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIA E SERVICOS DE SAUDE, 2014, 23 (01): : 183 - 184
  • [3] Assessing Quality in Systematic Literature Reviews: A Study of Novice Rater Training
    Acosta, Sandra
    Garza, Tiberio
    Hsu, Hsien-Yuan
    Goodson, Patricia
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [4] Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews
    Welsh, Emma J.
    Normansell, Rebecca A.
    Cates, Christopher J.
    [J]. NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 25
  • [5] Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews
    Emma J Welsh
    Rebecca A Normansell
    Christopher J Cates
    [J]. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 25
  • [6] Steps on searching and selecting studies for systematic reviews of the literature
    Pereira, Mauricio Gomes
    Galvao, Tais Freire
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIA E SERVICOS DE SAUDE, 2014, 23 (02): : 369 - 371
  • [7] Systematic reviews in five steps: V. Interpreting the findings
    Khan, K. S.
    Cavanillas, A. Bueno
    Zamora, J.
    [J]. MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2023, 49 (01):
  • [8] Systematic reviews in five steps: IV. Summarizing the evidence
    Saeed Khan, K.
    Bueno-Cavanillas, A.
    Zamora, J.
    [J]. MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2022, 48 (08):
  • [9] In response to "Systematic reviews in five steps": available automation tools
    Tercero-Hidalgo, J. R.
    Fernandez-Luna, J. M.
    [J]. MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2023, 49 (01):
  • [10] Assessing Quality in Systematic Reviews of Adverse Effects
    Sabate, Monica
    Ferrer, Pili
    Ballarin, Elena
    Rottenkolber, Marietta
    Schmiedl, Sven
    Schoonen, Marieke
    Fortuny, Joan
    Tatt, Iain
    Laporte, Joan-Ramon
    Hasford, Joerg
    Ibanez, Luisa
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 : 505 - 505
12345