Wide Excision or Mohs Micrographic Surgery for the Treatment of Primary Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

被引:82
|
作者
Meguerditchian, Ari-Nareg [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Jiping [4 ,5 ]
Lema, Bethany [6 ]
Kraybill, William G. [7 ]
Zeitouni, Nathalie C. [8 ]
Kane, John M., III [9 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
[2] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[3] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Biostat, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Biostat, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[5] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Surg, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[6] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Dermatol, Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[7] St Lukes Hosp, Dept Surg, Kansas City, MO USA
[8] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Dermatol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[9] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans; Mohs micrographic; surgery; wide local excision; recurrence; margins; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1097/COC.0b013e3181aaca87
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a spindle cell tumor with a high local recurrence rate. Wide excision (WE) has been the standard treatment, but ideal margin width is poorly defined and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has emerged as an alternative procedure. This study examines the use of WE versus MMS for the treatment of primary DFSP at a single institution. Methods: Retrospective review of 48 primary DFSP cases treated from 1971 to 2006. Patient demographics, tumor features, surgical modality (WE vs. MMS), final pathology, and clinical outcome were evaluated. Results: Twenty-eight patients underwent WE versus 20 patients for MMS. Median age was 40 years. Median WE margin width was 2 cm. For MMS, the median number of layers required to clear the tumor was 2. Median maximal defect size was 10 cm for WE versus 9.4 cm for MMS. Advanced closure techniques were required for 18% WE versus 65% MMS (P = 0.001). Median operative time was significantly lower for WE at 77 minutes versus 257 minutes for MMS (P < 0.001). Positive margins were present in 21.4% (6/28) WE versus 0% MMS (P = 0.01). At a median follow-up of 49.9 months for WE and 40.4 months for MMS, local recurrence rates were 3.6% (1/28) and 0%, respectively (P = 1.0). Conclusions: From a surgical standpoint, WE was faster than MMS and resulted in a less complex defect/closure. Although positive margin resection was more common with WE, local control was ultimately similar for the 2 surgical modalities. The choice of WE versus MMS should be based on individualized patients/tumor characteristics and institutional expertise in these modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 303
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wide Local Excision or Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Primary Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans
    Brewer, Jerry D.
    Roenigk, Randall K.
    Otley, Clark C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 34 (05): : 545 - 546
  • [2] Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs Micrographic Surgery
    Mullen, John T.
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 25 (04) : 827 - +
  • [3] A comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
    Gloster, HM
    Harris, KR
    Roenigk, RK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 35 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [4] Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Wide local excision vs. Mohs micrographic surgery
    Paradisi, A.
    Abeni, D.
    Rusciani, A.
    Cigna, E.
    Wolter, M.
    Scuderi, N.
    Rusciani, L.
    Kaufmann, R.
    Podda, M.
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2008, 34 (08) : 728 - 736
  • [5] TREATMENT OF DERMATOFIBROSARCOMA PROTUBERANS WITH MOHS MICROGRAPHIC SURGERY
    HOBBS, ER
    WHEELAND, RG
    BAILIN, PL
    RATZ, JL
    YETMAN, RJ
    ZINS, JE
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1988, 207 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [6] Mohs micrographic surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
    Roh, Mi Ryung
    Chung, Kee Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 62 (03) : AB147 - AB147
  • [7] Mohs' micrographic surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
    Roh, M. R.
    Bae, B.
    Chung, K. Y.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 35 (08) : 849 - 852
  • [8] Mohs micrographic surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
    Rajpara, S.
    Varma, S.
    Perks, G.
    Perkins, W.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 163 : 108 - 109
  • [9] EFECTIVENESS OF MOHS MICROGRAPHIC SURGERY IN THE DERMATOFIBROSARCOMA PROTUBERANS TREATMENT
    Perez Paredes, M.
    Alonso Alonso, T.
    Gonzalez Sixto, B.
    Otero Rivas, M.
    Valladares Narganes, L.
    Gonzalez Moran, A.
    Rodriguez Casado, L.
    Rodriguez Prieto, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 17 - 17
  • [10] Underuse of Mohs Micrographic Surgery for the Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans
    Zwald, Fiona O.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 148 (09) : 1064 - 1064