Specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment in oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

被引:19
|
作者
Horwich, P. [1 ,2 ]
MacKay, C. [1 ,2 ]
Bullock, M. [2 ,3 ]
Taylor, S. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hart, R. [1 ,2 ]
Trites, J. [1 ,2 ]
Geldenhuys, L. [2 ,3 ]
Williams, B. [1 ,2 ]
Rigby, M. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Dept Surg, 3rd Floor Dickson Bldg,VG Site,5820 Univ Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, 3rd Floor Dickson Bldg,VG Site,5820 Univ Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[3] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Anat Pathol, Dept Pathol, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Frozen section; Margin status; Oral cavity; Oropharynx; Squamous cell carcinoma; FROZEN-SECTION MARGINS; SURGICAL MARGIN; NECK-CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; ADVANCED HEAD; RESECTION; DYSPHAGIA; SURVIVAL; TRISMUS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s40463-021-00501-5
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Evaluate the oncologic outcomes and cost analysis of transitioning to a specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment protocol from a tumour bed sampling protocol in oral cavity (OCSCC) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Study design: Retrospective case series and subsequent prospective cohort study Setting: Tertiary care academic teaching hospital Subjects and methods: Retrospective case series of all institutional T1-T2 OCSCC or OPSCC treated with primary surgery between January 1st 2009 - December 31st 2014. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates with log rank tests were used to compare patients based on final margin status. Cost analysis was performed for escalation of therapy due to positive final margins. Following introduction of a specimen derived margin protocol, successive prospective cohort study of T1-T4 OCSCC or OPSCC treated with primary surgery from January 1st 2017 - December 31st 2018. Analysis and comparison of both protocols included review of intraoperative margins, final pathology and treatment cost. Results: Analysis of our intra-operative tumour bed frozen section protocol revealed 15 of 116 (12.9%) patients had positive final pathology margins, resulting in post-operative escalation of therapy for 14/15 patients in the form of re-resection (7/14), radiation therapy (6/14) and chemoradiotherapy (1/14). One other patient with positive final margins received escalated therapy for additional negative prognostic factors. Recurrence free survival at 3 years was 88.4 and 50.7% for negative and positive final margins respectively (p = 0.048). Implementation of a specimen oriented frozen section protocol resulted in 1 of 111 patients (0.9%) having positive final pathology margins, a statistically significant decrease (p <0.001). Utilizing our specimen oriented protocol, there was an absolute risk reduction for having a final positive margin of 12.0% and relative risk reduction of 93.0%. Estimated cost avoidance applying the specimen oriented protocol to our previous cohort was $412,052.812017 CAD. Conclusion: Implementation of a specimen oriented intraoperative margin protocol provides a statistically significant decrease in final positive margins. This change in protocol leads to decreased patient morbidity by avoiding therapy escalation attributable only to positive margins, and avoids the economic costs of these treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment in oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
    P. Horwich
    C. MacKay
    M. Bullock
    S. M. Taylor
    R. Hart
    J. Trites
    L. Geldenhuys
    B. Williams
    M. H. Rigby
    Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 50
  • [2] Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Genomics
    Tan, Marietta
    Myers, Jeffrey N.
    Agrawal, Nishant
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 46 (04) : 545 - +
  • [3] Paradigm Change for Intraoperative Surgical Margin Assessment for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Tessler, Idit
    Marilena, Vered
    Alon, Eran E.
    Gecel, Nir A.
    Remer, Eric
    Gluck, Iris
    Yoffe, Tal
    Dobriyan, Alex
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (04): : 1725 - 1732
  • [4] Margin Assessment Methods in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Recurrence Tumor Bed vs Resection Specimen Sampling
    Wu, Shannon S.
    Woody, Neil
    Hesse, Jennifer
    Cook, Samantha
    Cracolici, Vincent
    Ku, Jamie A.
    Prendes, Brandon
    Silver, Natalie
    Scharpf, Joseph
    Brauer, Philip R.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Campbell, Shauna R.
    Koyfman, Shlomo A.
    Burkey, Brian
    Lamarre, Eric D.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 149 (11) : 1011 - 1020
  • [5] Margin Analysis: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity
    Shapiro, Michael
    Salarha, Andrew
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 29 (03) : 259 - +
  • [6] Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for margin evaluation of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
    Javaria P. Ali
    Bakhtawar Allauddin Mallick
    Khushbakht Rashid
    Umair Arshad Malik
    Atif Ali Hashmi
    Shamail Zia
    Muhammad Irfan
    Amir Khan
    Naveen Faridi
    BMC Research Notes, 17
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for margin evaluation of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
    Ali, Javaria P.
    Mallick, Bakhtawar Allauddin
    Rashid, Khushbakht
    Malik, Umair Arshad
    Hashmi, Atif Ali
    Zia, Shamail
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Khan, Amir
    Faridi, Naveen
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [8] Margin Assessment in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Duvvuri, Uma
    Seethala, Raja R.
    Chiosea, Simion I.
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (03) : 452 - 453
  • [9] Margin Sampling and Survival Outcomes in Oral Cavity and p16-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    MacKay, Colin
    Turner, Brooke
    Bullock, Martin
    Taylor, S. Mark
    Trites, Jonathan
    Corsten, Martin
    Geldenhuys, Laurette
    Rigby, Matthew H.
    OTO OPEN, 2022, 6 (03)
  • [10] Reply to Margin Assessment in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Ch'ng, Sydney
    Gupta, Ruta
    Clark, Jonathan R.
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (03) : 454 - 454