Hip adduction strength and provoked groin pain: A comparison of long-lever squeeze testing using the ForceFrame and the Copenhagen 5-Second-Squeeze test

被引:11
|
作者
Nielsen, Mathias F. [1 ]
Thorborg, Kristian [1 ]
Krommes, Kasper [1 ]
Thornton, Kasper B. [2 ]
Holmich, Per [1 ]
Penalver, Juan J. J. [2 ]
Ishoi, Lasse [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Amager & Hvidovre, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sports Orthoped Res Ctr Copenhagen SORC C, Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] FC Nordsjaelland AS, Dept Human Performance, Right Dream Grp, Farum, Denmark
关键词
Adductor strength; Groin pain; Soccer; Groin injury; ForceFrame; 5-Second-squeeze test; Handheld dynamometer; FOOTBALL; INJURY; LOCATION; ABDUCTOR; PREDICT; SCORES; TORQUE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.02.002
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare long-lever squeeze testing using the ForceFrame and the Copenhagen 5-SecondSqueeze test (5SST) for assessment of hip adduction strength and provoked groin pain in elite male soccer players. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Pre-season testing at facilities of a Danish professional 1st tier soccer club and academy. Participants: Elite male soccer players (n = 83, mean age; 16 +/- 2.7 years) from U13, U14, U15, U17, U19 and senior teams cleared for full training and match participation. Results: Hip adduction strength was 16% lower in the ForceFrame. A Bland-Altman plot showed a systematic bias (-0.47 Nm/kg, 95% CI [-0.57; -0.38]) and lack of agreement (95% limits of agreement: -1.31; 0.39 Nm/kg). In the ForceFrame, provoked groin pain was less intense (median NRS 0 [IQR: 0-1] vs. 555T: 1 [IQR: 0-3], p < 0.001) and reported by fewer players (NRS >0) (27% [n = 22] vs. 555T: 61.4% [n = 51], p < 0.001). Conclusions: The ForceFrame and the 5SST lack agreement and are not interchangeable methods. This may have implications when selecting a method for screening and detecting early groin problems in male soccer players. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据