Brightness sensitivity and color perception as predictors of relative afferent pupillary defect

被引:6
|
作者
Danesh-Meyer, Helen V. [1 ]
Papchenko, Taras L.
Savino, Peter J.
Gamble, Greg D.
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Ophthalmol, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Wills Eye Hosp, Neuroophthalmol Serv, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Med, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.1167/iovs.06-1076
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To characterize the relationship between brightness sensitivity and color perception and relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) in patients with optic neuropathy. METHODS. The "swinging flashlight test" was used to diagnose RAPD, the degree of which was quantified by neutral density filters, in 325 consecutive patients in a case- control study. A separate examiner, masked to the pupillary findings, then assessed participants for Ishihara color plate reading, brightness sense, and red perception. The latter two were quantified by asking the patient to score (out of 100%) brightness (of a light source) or redness (of an object) of the two eyes relative to each other. Pearson correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS. Brightness sense (r = -0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.84 to -0.73; P < 0.0001), red perception (r = -0.73; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.65; P < 0.0001), and Ishihara color plate reading (r = -0.68; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.66; P < 0.0001) were each strongly and highly significantly correlated with the diagnosis and degree of RAPD. Brightness sense and red perception were each able to discriminate almost all the area under ROC for the diagnosis of RAPD (area of 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00; P < 0.0001; area of 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96; P < 0.0001, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of brightness sense in detection of RAPD were 99% (95% CI, 0.97-1.00) and 95% (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), respectively. The red perception test was only slightly less accurate. CONCLUSIONS. Rapid, simple assessments of brightness sense and color perception provide accurate methods to facilitate the diagnosis of optic neuropathy and may prove to be valuable in screening for optic neuropathy or alternatives to the swinging flashlight test.
引用
收藏
页码:3616 / 3621
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BRIGHTNESS SENSE AND THE RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT
    LAM, BL
    THOMPSON, HS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 108 (04) : 462 - 463
  • [2] Relative afferent pupillary defect, or afferent pupillary defect?
    Papalkar, D
    Francis, IC
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 34 (02): : 193 - 193
  • [3] RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT
    THOMPSON, HS
    CORBETT, JJ
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1985, 42 (06) : 516 - 516
  • [4] Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect
    Manjunathan, Sujatha
    Saini, Lokesh
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (08): : E15 - E15
  • [5] Predictors of visual acuity and the relative afferent pupillary defect in optic neuropathy
    Bobak, SP
    Goodwin, JA
    Guevara, RA
    Arya, A
    Grover, S
    [J]. DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1999, 97 (01) : 81 - 95
  • [6] Predictors of visual acuity and the relative afferent pupillary defect in optic neuropathy
    Bobak S.P.
    Goodwin J.A.
    Guevara R.A.
    Arya A.
    Grover S.
    [J]. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 1998, 97 (1) : 81 - 95
  • [7] RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT IN A LESION OF THE PRETECTAL AFFERENT PUPILLARY PATHWAY
    JOHNSON, RE
    BELL, RA
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1987, 22 (05): : 282 - 284
  • [8] VARIABILITY OF THE RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT
    KARDON, R
    MOORE, P
    SELKY, A
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1994, 35 (04) : 2059 - 2059
  • [9] PUPILLOGRAPHY OF A RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT
    COX, TA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1986, 101 (03) : 320 - 324
  • [10] Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect in Glaucoma
    Skorkovska, K.
    Wilhelm, H.
    Luedtke, H.
    Wilhelm, B.
    [J]. KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2011, 228 (11) : 979 - 983