Approximating covariance matrices estimated in multivariate models by estimated auto- and cross-covariances

被引:23
|
作者
Koch, K. R. [1 ]
Kuhlmann, H. [1 ]
Schuh, W. -D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Geodesy & Geoinformat, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
关键词
Multivariate linear model; Positive semidefinite function; Compactly supported covariance function; Auto- and cross-covariance function; Monte Carlo simulation; Laserscanner; LEAST-SQUARES COLLOCATION; GIBBS SAMPLER; TIME-SERIES; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00190-010-0375-5
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Quantities like tropospheric zenith delays or station coordinates are repeatedly measured at permanent VLBI or GPS stations so that time series for the quantities at each station are obtained. The covariances of these quantities can be estimated in a multivariate linear model. The covariances are needed for computing uncertainties of results derived from these quantities. The covariance matrix for many permanent stations becomes large, the need for simplifying it may therefore arise under the condition that the uncertainties of derived results still agree. This is accomplished by assuming that the different time series of a quantity like the station height for each permanent station can be combined to obtain one time series. The covariance matrix then follows from the estimates of the auto- and cross-covariance functions of the combined time series. A further approximation is found, if compactly supported covariance functions are fitted to an estimated autocovariance function in order to obtain a covariance matrix which is representative of different kinds of measurements. The simplification of a covariance matrix estimated in a multivariate model is investigated here for the coordinates of points of a grid measured repeatedly by a laserscanner. The approximations are checked by determining the uncertainty of the sum of distances to the points of the grid. To obtain a realistic value for this uncertainty, the covariances of the measured coordinates have to be considered. Three different setups of measurements are analyzed and a covariance matrix is found which is representative for all three setups. Covariance matrices for the measurements of laserscanners can therefore be determined in advance without estimating them for each application.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 397
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Approximating covariance matrices estimated in multivariate models by estimated auto- and cross-covariances
    K. R. Koch
    H. Kuhlmann
    W.-D. Schuh
    Journal of Geodesy, 2010, 84 : 383 - 397
  • [2] Markov Models for Cross-Covariances
    A. G. Journel
    Mathematical Geology, 1999, 31 : 955 - 964
  • [3] Markov models for cross-covariances
    Journel, AG
    MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1999, 31 (08): : 955 - 964
  • [4] Monitoring the cross-covariances of a multivariate time series
    Sliwa, P
    Schmid, W
    METRIKA, 2005, 61 (01) : 89 - 115
  • [5] Monitoring the cross-covariances of a multivariate time series
    Przemysław Śliwa
    Wolfgang Schmid
    Metrika, 2005, 61 : 89 - 115
  • [6] Variance-covariance component estimation for structured errors-in-variables models with cross-covariances
    Lv, Zhipeng
    Sui, Lifen
    STUDIA GEOPHYSICA ET GEODAETICA, 2019, 63 (04) : 485 - 508
  • [7] Variance-covariance component estimation for structured errors-in-variables models with cross-covariances
    Zhipeng Lv
    Lifen Sui
    Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2019, 63 : 485 - 508
  • [8] Parameter inference with estimated covariance matrices
    Sellentin, Elena
    Heavens, Alan F.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 456 (01) : L132 - L136
  • [9] Improving the condition number of estimated covariance matrices
    Tabeart, Jemima M.
    Dance, Sarah L.
    Lawless, Amos S.
    Nichols, Nancy K.
    Waller, Joanne A.
    TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2020, 72 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [10] Positive semidefiniteness of estimated covariance matrices in linear models for sample survey data
    Haslett, Stephen
    SPECIAL MATRICES, 2016, 4 (01): : 218 - 224