Frequency and characteristics of contralateral breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography

被引:3
|
作者
Lameijer, Joost R. C. [1 ]
Coolen, Angela M. P. [2 ]
Voogd, Adri C. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Strobbe, Luc J. [6 ]
Louwman, Marieke W. J. [4 ]
Venderink, Dick [6 ]
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivian C. [5 ]
Duijm, Lucien E. M. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Michelangelolaan 2, NL-5623EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Elisabeth Tweesteden Hosp ETZ, Dept Radiol, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, NL-5022 GC Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, P Debyelaan 1, NL-6229 HA Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org IKNL, Dept Res, POB 19079, NL-3501 DB Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] GROW Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Med Oncol, POB 5800, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening, POB 6873, NL-6503 GJ Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Mammography; Mass screening; Breast neoplasms; Breast; Radiology; ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DENSE BREASTS; CANCER; WOMEN; TOMOSYNTHESIS; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5370-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo determine the frequency and characteristics of contralateral, non-recalled breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography.MethodsWe included a series of 130,338 screening mammograms performed between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2016. During the 1-year follow-up, clinical data were collected for all recalls. Screening outcome was determined for recalled women with or without evaluation of contralateral breast abnormalities.ResultsOf 3,995 recalls (recall rate 3.1%), 129 women (3.2%) underwent assessment of a contralateral, non-recalled breast abnormality. Most lesions were detected at clinical mammography and/or breast tomosynthesis (101 women, 78.3%). The biopsy rate was similar for recalled lesions and contralateral, non-recalled lesions, but the positive predictive value of biopsy was higher for recalled lesions (p = 0.01). A comparable proportion of the recalled lesions and contralateral, non-recalled lesions were malignant (p = 0.1). The proportion of ductal carcinoma in situ was similar for both groups, as well as invasive cancer characteristics and type of surgical treatment.ConclusionsAbout 3% of recalled women underwent evaluation of contralateral, non-recalled breast lesions. Evaluation of the contralateral breast after recall is important as we found that 15.5% of contralateral, non-recalled lesions were malignant. Contralateral cancers and screen-detected cancers show similar characteristics, stage and surgical treatment.Key Points center dot 3% of recalled women underwent evaluation of contralateral, non-recalled lesions center dot One out of seven contralateral, non-recalled lesions was malignant center dot A contralateral cancer was diagnosed in 0.5% of recalls center dot Screen-detected cancers and non-recalled, contralateral cancers showed similar histological characteristics center dot Tumour stage and surgical treatment were similar for both groups
引用
收藏
页码:4205 / 4214
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Frequency and characteristics of contralateral breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography
    Joost R. C. Lameijer
    Angela MP Coolen
    Adri C. Voogd
    Luc J. Strobbe
    Marieke W. J. Louwman
    Dick Venderink
    Vivian C. Tjan-Heijnen
    Lucien E. M. Duijm
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 4205 - 4214
  • [2] Correction to: Frequency and characteristics of contralateral breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography
    Joost R. C. Lameijer
    Angela MP Coolen
    Adri C. Voogd
    Luc J. Strobbe
    Marieke W. J. Louwman
    Dick Venderink
    Vivian C. Tjan-Heijnen
    Lucien E. M. Duijm
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1059 - 1059
  • [3] Frequency and characteristics of contralateral breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography (vol 28, pg 4205, 2018)
    Lameijer, Joost R. C.
    Coolen, Angela M. P.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Strobbe, Luc J.
    Louwman, Marieke W. J.
    Venderink, Dick
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivian C.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (02) : 1059 - 1059
  • [4] Frequency and characteristics of additionally detected ipsilateral breast lesions following recall at screening mammography
    Lameijer, Joost R. C.
    Coolen, Angela M. P.
    Nederend, Joost
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    BREAST, 2018, 42 : 94 - 101
  • [5] HEALTH INSURER BURDEN OF PATIENT RECALL FOLLOWING BREAST CANCER SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY
    Bonafede, M. M.
    Miller, J. D.
    Lenhart, G. M.
    Nelson, J.
    Fajardo, L. L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A82 - A82
  • [6] Breast implant rupture following contralateral mammography
    Pay, AD
    Kenealy, J
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 99 (06) : 1734 - 1735
  • [7] Frequency and diagnostic outcome of bilateral recall at screening mammography
    Lameijer, Joost R. C.
    Nederend, Joost
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 148 (01) : 48 - 56
  • [8] PATIENT RECALL FOLLOWING BREAST CANCER SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY AMONG MEDICAID PATIENTS BY PATIENT RACE
    Bonafede, M. M.
    Miller, J. D.
    Huang, A.
    Troeger, K. A.
    Fajardo, L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A255 - A255
  • [9] Contralateral breast screening using mammography - is it worthwhile in developing countries?
    Parmar, V.
    Nadkarni, M. S.
    Thakur, M.
    Shet, T.
    Badwe, R. A.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 6 (07): : 64 - 65
  • [10] Communicating the risk of recall in mammography screening - Enskilment in breast radiography
    Gram, E. G.
    Jonsson, A. B. R.
    Larsen, L. B.
    Adlouni, M.
    Mussmann, B.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2025, 31 (01) : 139 - 145