Consistency of the Casagrande Liquid Limit Test

被引:27
|
作者
Haigh, Stuart [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
来源
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL | 2016年 / 39卷 / 01期
关键词
plasticity; identification and classification of soils; texture plasticity; density characteristics of soils; SOILS;
D O I
10.1520/GTJ20150093
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The liquid limit test is one of the most widely used tests in soil mechanics, with the value obtained being correlated against a variety of soil properties such as soil strength. The percussion test for liquid limit originally described by Casagrande [Casagrande, A., 1932, "Research on the Atterberg Limits of Soils," Public Roads, Vol. 13, pp. 121-136] is the standard test for liquid limit in much of the world. The apparatus to be used is described in many design codes including ASTM D4318-10e1 [Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA]. While it is well known that two classes of these devices exist, those with hard and soft bases, the true picture is more complex; international design codes contain a great variety of specifications for the devices, some much more prescriptive than others. This paper uses the analysis described by Haigh (2012) to investigate the effects of base hardness and resilience on specific strength at liquid limit. A survey of devices in use worldwide was also carried out, indicating that both the variability in national design standards and potential degradation of bases over time leads to a large variability in the specific strength observed at liquid limit when different devices are used. The paper demonstrates that both base hardness and resilience must be regularly monitored in order to achieve consistency of liquid limit test results and that international standards should be more closely aligned if measured values are to be used within regressions based on liquid limit tests carried out with apparatus based on a different standard.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 19
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanics of the Casagrande liquid limit test
    Haigh, S. K.
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (09) : 1015 - 1023
  • [2] Discussion of "Mechanics of the Casagrande liquid limit test"
    Prakash, K.
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (11) : 1325 - 1326
  • [3] Consistency measurement of cement-treated marine clay using fall cone test and Casagrande liquid limit test
    Kang, Gyeongo
    Tsuchida, Takashi
    Tang, T. X.
    Kalim, T. P.
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2017, 57 (05) : 802 - 814
  • [4] Reply to the discussion by Prakash on "Mechanics of the Casagrande liquid limit test"
    Haigh, Stuart K.
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (11) : 1327 - 1328
  • [5] Mechanics of the Casagrande liquid limit test (vol 49, pg 1015, 2012)
    Haigh, Stuart K.
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (11) : 1329 - 1329
  • [6] Limit analysis, rammed earth material and Casagrande test
    El-Nabouch, Ranime
    Pastor, Joseph
    Quoc-Bao Bui
    Ple, Olivier
    COMPTES RENDUS MECANIQUE, 2018, 346 (02): : 98 - 109
  • [7] Comparison of Liquid Limit of Soils Resulted from Casagrande Test and Modificated Cone Penetrometer Methodology
    Hrubesova, Eva
    Lunackova, Barbara
    Brodzki, Ondrej
    PROCEEDING OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL, URBAN AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 : 364 - 370
  • [8] Liquid limit determination of clayey material by Casagrande method, fall cone test and EBS parameter
    Quintela, A.
    Costa, C.
    Terroso, D.
    Rocha, F.
    MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 29 (B2) : B82 - B87
  • [9] Fallacy of wide undrained strength range at the Casagrande liquid limit
    O'Kelly, Brendan C.
    GEOTECHNICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 6 (03) : 205 - 217
  • [10] COMPARISON OF LIQUID LIMIT VALUES DETERMINED ACCORDING TO CASAGRANDE AND VASILEV
    JURGENSON, L
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 1976, 26 (03): : 539 - 539