Detecting Building Changes between Airborne Laser Scanning and Photogrammetric Data

被引:43
|
作者
Zhang, Zhenchao [1 ]
Vosselman, George [1 ]
Gerke, Markus [2 ]
Persello, Claudio [1 ]
Tuia, Devis [3 ]
Yang, Michael Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac ITC, Dept Earth Observat Sci, NL-7514 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Geodesy & Photogrammetry, DE-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
[3] Wageningen Univ, Lab Geoinformat Sci & Remote Sensing, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
change detection; multimodal data; convolutional neural networks; Siamese networks; airborne laser scanning; dense image matching; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.3390/rs11202417
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Detecting topographic changes in an urban environment and keeping city-level point clouds up-to-date are important tasks for urban planning and monitoring. In practice, remote sensing data are often available only in different modalities for two epochs. Change detection between airborne laser scanning data and photogrammetric data is challenging due to the multi-modality of the input data and dense matching errors. This paper proposes a method to detect building changes between multimodal acquisitions. The multimodal inputs are converted and fed into a light-weighted pseudo-Siamese convolutional neural network (PSI-CNN) for change detection. Different network configurations and fusion strategies are compared. Our experiments on a large urban data set demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Our change map achieves a recall rate of 86.17%, a precision rate of 68.16%, and an F-1-score of 76.13%. The comparison between Siamese architecture and feed-forward architecture brings many interesting findings and suggestions to the design of networks for multimodal data processing.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VERIFICATION AND IMPROVING PLANIMETRIC ACCURACY OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA WITH USING PHOTOGRAMMETRIC DATA
    Bakula, K.
    Dominik, W.
    Ostrowski, W.
    EUROPEAN CALIBRATION AND ORIENTATION WORKSHOP (EUROCOW 2014), 2014, : 21 - 26
  • [2] Building reconstruction from airborne laser scanning data
    Huang Xianfeng
    GEO-SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2013, 16 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [3] Detecting Terrain Stoniness From Airborne Laser Scanning Data
    Nevalainen, Paavo
    Middleton, Maarit
    Sutinen, Raimo
    Heikkonen, Jukka
    Pahikkala, Tapio
    REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (09)
  • [4] Detecting the presence of natural forests using airborne laser scanning data
    Marie-Claude Jutras-Perreault
    Terje Gobakken
    Erik N?sset
    Hans Ole ?rka
    Forest Ecosystems, 2023, 10 (06) : 668 - 680
  • [5] Detecting the presence of natural forests using airborne laser scanning data
    Jutras-Perreault, Marie-Claude
    Gobakken, Terje
    Naesset, Erik
    Orka, Hans Ole
    FOREST ECOSYSTEMS, 2023, 10
  • [6] Ice elevation changes surveyed with Airborne Laser Scanning Data
    Hernandez, Jorge
    Paredes, Pablo
    Carrion, Daniela
    Rivera, Andres
    2017 FIRST IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING (GRSS-CHILE), 2017, : 72 - 75
  • [7] INTEGRATION OF DIGITAL SURFACE MODELS FROM PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AND AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA FOR THE PROCESSING OF RADAR IMAGERY
    Kraszewski, Bartlomiej
    Karwel, Artur Karol
    Kurczynski, Zdzislaw
    Ziolkowski, Dariusz
    INFORMATICS, GEOINFORMATICS AND REMOTE SENSING CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL II, 2016, : 917 - 924
  • [8] Detection and Classification of Changes in Buildings from Airborne Laser Scanning Data
    Xu, Sudan
    Vosselman, George
    Elberink, Sander Oude
    REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (12): : 17051 - 17076
  • [9] Building Extraction from Airborne Laser Scanning Data: An Analysis of the State of the Art
    Tomljenovic, Ivan
    Hoefle, Bernhard
    Tiede, Dirk
    Blaschke, Thomas
    REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (04) : 3826 - 3862
  • [10] Detecting overmature forests with airborne laser scanning (ALS)
    Fuhr, Marc
    Lalechere, Etienne
    Monnet, Jean-Matthieu
    Berges, Laurent
    REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 8 (05) : 731 - 743