Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in digisonic cochlear implant users

被引:27
|
作者
Truy, E
Gallego, S
Chanal, JM
Collet, L
Morgon, A
机构
[1] Hop Edouard Herriot, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, F-69437 Lyon 03, France
[2] Lab Percept & Mecanismes Auditifs, Lyon, France
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 1998年 / 108卷 / 04期
关键词
cochlear implant; electrically elicited auditory brainstem responses; human; objective measures; tuning aids;
D O I
10.1097/00005537-199804000-00017
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the relationships between psychophysical perceptions and the electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) in multichannel cochlear implant (Cn users and to determine the effectiveness of EABRs in electrode failure. Design: A descriptive study reported the EABR characteristics while the different electrodes were activated, Characteristics of the EABR. and of the perceptual measures served as compared variables in a correlational study, Setting: The study was carried out ill Che audiology clinic of an otolaryngology department at a university hospital, Patients: The subjects consisted of nine consecutively selected habitual Digisonie DX10(R) multichannel CI users, Seven patients mere postlinguistically deafened adult patients; two mere congenitally deaf children, Main Outcome Measures: Ipsilateral recordings were performed using a previously published method, Morphology, latency, and amplitude measures of the EABR recordings were described, computed, and compared with the literature data for EABRs obtained while activating other types of CI and for acoustically evoked ABRs, Correlations between EABRs and behavioral perception thresholds mere analyzed using the parametric Pearson's correlation test, Results: EABRs allowed the authors to detect failure of mo. 10 electrode integrity in one child, Perceptual threshold measures were found to be highly significantly related to the EABR threshold across subjects and electrode position (n = 31, r = 0.98; ID < 0.001; linear regression equation: perceptual threshold = 1.06 EABR threshold + 0.76), The latencies and amplitudes were found to be similar to those described in the literature. Conclusions: EABRs may be used to estimate settings for the Digisonic DX10 C1 even in a pediatric population, although they cannot entirely replace behavioral measurements, especially in children, The EABR can be employed for electrode dysfunction diagnosis, Further studies sire needed to determine whether recordings of EABR quality could contribute to the evaluation of functional prognosis during the rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 559
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Auditory late cortical response and speech recognition in Digisonic cochlear implant users
    Maurer, J
    Collet, L
    Pelster, H
    Truy, E
    Gallégo, S
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2002, 112 (12): : 2220 - 2224
  • [2] Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implant Users Compared With Cochlear Implant Users With Additional Disabilities
    van der Straaten, Tirza F. K.
    Netten, Anouk P.
    Boermans, Peter Paul B. M.
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Scholing, Esther
    Koot, Radboud W.
    Malessy, Martijn J. A.
    van der Mey, Andel G. L.
    Verbist, Berit M.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (07) : 936 - 945
  • [3] Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation
    Robert P. Carlyon
    John M. Deeks
    Colette M. McKay
    [J]. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2015, 16 : 653 - 668
  • [4] Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    Deeks, John M.
    McKay, Colette M.
    [J]. JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 16 (05): : 653 - 668
  • [5] Examination of the implant electrical auditory brainstem response threshold with and without the positioner for the clarion 16 cochlear implant
    Shimizu, A
    Kawano, A
    Hagiwara, A
    Tomizawa, A
    Wakasa, E
    Suzuki, M
    Ochiai, H
    Iwasaki, J
    Enoki, F
    [J]. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS - AN UPDATE, 2002, : 315 - 319
  • [6] Results of the MXM digisonic auditory brainstem implant clinical trials in Europe
    Vincent, C
    Zini, C
    Gandolfi, A
    Triglia, JM
    Pellet, W
    Truy, E
    Fischer, G
    Maurizi, M
    Meglio, M
    Lejeune, JP
    Vaneecloo, FM
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2002, 23 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [7] Free-field evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant users
    Schebsdat, Erik
    Kohl, Manuel C.
    Corona-Strauss, Farah, I
    Seidler, Harald
    Strauss, Daniel J.
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 8 (02) : 44 - 53
  • [8] Comparison of Neural Response Telemetry and Electrical Stapedius Reflexes with Behavioral Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users
    Saki, Nader
    Khorram, Hadi
    Nikakhlagh, Soheila
    Abshirini, Hasan
    Karimi, Majid
    Bayat, Arash
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2018, 12 (03) : S1089 - S1093
  • [9] A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users
    Rader, Tobias
    Doms, Philipp
    Adel, Youssef
    Weissgerber, Tobias
    Strieth, Sebastian
    Baumann, Uwe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 57 (07) : 502 - 509
  • [10] Comparison of procedures to determine electrical stimulation thresholds in cochlear implant users
    van Wieringen, A
    Wouters, J
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2001, 22 (06): : 528 - 538