Cost-effectiveness of using chatbots in healthcare: a systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Fgaier, Meriem [1 ]
Zrubka, Zsombor [2 ]
机构
[1] Obuda Univ, Doctoral Sch Appl Informat & Appl Math, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, Hlth Econ Res Ctr, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
chatbots; conversational agents; cost-effectiveness; systematic review;
D O I
10.1109/CINTI-MACRo57952.2022.10029478
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Chatbots are automated conversation agents which are initiated through text and/ or voice messages using smartphones, computers, or other connected devices. The implementation of chatbot technology in healthcare has been growing during the recent years and chatbots are increasingly used in diagnostic tools or for patient management. Through the years, a moderate amount and mixed quality evidence has been generated on the efficacy and safety of healthcare chatbots, and despite their cost-saving potential, research on their cost-effectiveness has been scarce. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the methods and results of cost-effectiveness studies involving healthcare chatbots. Literature search was executed via PubMed and Web of Science. Two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. A descriptive summary was performed. The reporting quality of both studies was poor. Both studies indicated that their cost-effectiveness measurements were study-based but only one study reported actuals costs. Cost effectiveness referred to resource savings on healthcare processes, but patients' health outcomes were not measured, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were not reported. Therefore, the cost-effectiveness of healthcare chatbots should be further assessed by formal health economic evaluations.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:305 / 310
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of orthodontics: a systematic review
    Jermyn, Owen
    Bister, Dirk
    Jin, Huajie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 44 (05) : 566 - 577
  • [2] A systematic review on the cost-effectiveness of statins
    Franco, O
    Bonneux, L
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 463 - 463
  • [3] A systematic review of fear of cancer recurrence related healthcare use and intervention cost-effectiveness
    Williams, Jake Thomas Warton
    Pearce, Alison
    Smith, Allan 'Ben'
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 (08) : 1185 - 1195
  • [4] The impact of health information exchange on healthcare quality and cost-effectiveness: A systematic literature review
    Sadoughi, Farahnaz
    Nasiri, Somayeh
    Ahmadi, Hossein
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 161 : 209 - 232
  • [5] Cost-Effectiveness Studies in the ICU: A Systematic Review
    Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
    Vaughan, Kelsey
    Chong, Christopher A. K. Y.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    Bell, Chaim M.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (08) : 1011 - 1017
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of surgical comanagement: A systematic review
    Luu, Bryan C.
    Davis, Matthew J.
    Raj, Sarth
    Abu-Ghname, Amjed
    Buchanan, Edward P.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2021, 19 (02): : 119 - 127
  • [7] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW EVALUATING COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ACUPUNCTURE
    Kim, S. Y.
    Lee, H.
    Park, H. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A255 - A255
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of measles treatment: a systematic review
    Nam Xuan Vo
    Anh Thi Van Nguyen
    Ha Thi Mai Tran
    Linh Thi Thuy Truong
    Nghi Ngoc Bao Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 69 (06) : S148 - S154
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of acromegaly treatments: a systematic review
    Letícia P. Leonart
    Helena H. L. Borba
    Vinicius L. Ferreira
    Bruno S. Riveros
    Roberto Pontarolo
    Pituitary, 2018, 21 : 642 - 652
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness in health in Brazil: a systematic review
    Moraz, Gabriele
    Garcez, Anderson da Silva
    de Assis, Eliseu Miranda
    dos Santos, Jandira Pereira
    Barcellos, Nemora Tregnago
    Kroeff, Locimara Ramos
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2015, 20 (10): : 3211 - 3229