Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer

被引:218
|
作者
Lindley, C
Vasa, S
Sawyer, WT
Winer, EP
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Pharm & Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Breast Oncol Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1380
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of breast cancer patients who survived 2 to 5 years following initiation of adjuvant cytotoxic and/or hormonal therapy and to characterize relationships between QOL and patient physical symptoms, sexual function, and preferences regarding adjuvant treatment. Patients and Methods: Eighty-six patients who had completed systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer between 1988 and 1991 were surveyed by written questionnaire and telephone interview. Sociodemographic information was obtained for each patient, and patients were asked to complete the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC), the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form 36 (SF-36), a series of questions regarding sexual function, and a survey about preferences for adjuvant therapy in relation to possible benefit. Results: The mean FLIC score among all patients was 138.3 (+/- 12.2), which suggests a high level of QOL. The reported frequency of moderate to severe symptoms was generally low (ie, < 15%), with fatigue (31.4%), insomnia (23.3%), and local numbness at the site of surgery (22.1%) occurring with greatest frequency patients reported a wide range of sexual difficulties. Preference assessment showed that more than 65% of patients were willing to undergo 6 months of chemotherapy for a 5% increase in likelihood of cancer cure. Conclusion: Self-rated QOL in breast cancer patients 2 to 5 years following adjuvant therapy was generally favorable. Less than one third of patients reported moderate to severe symptoms. Selected aspects of sexual function appeared to be compromised, The majority of patients indicated a willingness to accept 6 months of chemotherapy for small to modest potential benefit. (C) 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1380 / 1387
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of life and adjuvant system therapy for early-stage breast cancer
    Grimison, Peter S.
    Stockler, Martin R.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2007, 7 (08) : 1123 - 1134
  • [2] Progress in systemic adjuvant therapy of early-stage breast cancer
    William J. Gradishar
    Ruth M. O'Regan
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003, 8 (4) : 239 - 247
  • [3] Early-Stage Breast Cancer - Strategies for Adjuvant Systemic Therapy
    Goerner, M.
    Justz, M.
    Gerull, S.
    HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2008, 40 (04) : 230 - 238
  • [4] Patient preferences for adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer.
    Fama, T
    Wood, M
    Muss, H
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 61S - 61S
  • [5] Adjuvant systemic therapy for older adults with early-stage breast cancer
    Pal, Sumanta Kumar
    Mortimer, Joanne
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 5 (03) : 251 - 262
  • [6] Recent advances in adjuvant systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer
    Bedard, P. L.
    Cardoso, F.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 : 122 - 127
  • [7] Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?
    Jansen, SJT
    Kievit, J
    Nooij, MA
    de Haes, JCJM
    Overpelt, IME
    van Slooten, H
    Maartense, E
    Stiggelbout, AM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 84 (12) : 1577 - 1585
  • [8] Patients’ preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?
    S J T Jansen
    J Kievit
    M A Nooij
    J C J M de Haes
    I M E Overpelt
    H van Slooten
    E Maartense
    A M Stiggelbout
    British Journal of Cancer, 2001, 84 : 1577 - 1585
  • [9] Lifestyle and quality of life in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy
    Di Meglio, Antonio
    Soldato, Davide
    Presti, Daniele
    Vaz-Luis, Ines
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (06) : 553 - 573