From the Characterization of "European Philosophy of Science' to the Case of Philosophy of the Social Sciences

被引:3
|
作者
Gonzalez, Wenceslao J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ A Coruna, Fac Humanities, Ferrol 15403, A Coruna, Spain
关键词
STRUCTURAL REALISM;
D O I
10.1080/02698595.2015.1119418
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
How distinct is European philosophy of science? The first step is to characterize what is or might be considered as European philosophy of science'. The second is to analyse philosophy of the social sciences as a relevant case in the European contribution to philosophy of science. (1) European perspective' requires some clarification, which can be done from two main angles: the historical approach and the thematic view. Thus, there are several structural and dynamic things to be considered in European philosophy of science and compare with other conceptions: (i) the topics discussed; (ii) the contents proposed; and (iii) the style of thought used. (2) The case of philosophy of the social sciences is relevant for the historical approach and for the thematic view. Historically, the Erklaren-Verstehen methodological controversy arose in this continent, where the main authors and most of the influential approaches are located. Thematically, we can consider the contributions made by these European approaches to philosophy of the social sciences. They give us some distinctive features of European philosophy of science.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 188
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条