Assessing the Distinctiveness and Representativeness of Visual Vocabularies

被引:1
|
作者
Chang, Leonardo [1 ,2 ]
Perez-Suarez, Airel [1 ]
Rodriguez-Collada, Maximo [1 ]
Hernandez-Palancar, Jose [1 ]
Arias-Estrada, Miguel [2 ]
Enrique Sucar, Luis [2 ]
机构
[1] Adv Technol Applicat Ctr CENATAV, 7A 21406 Siboney, Havana 12200, Cuba
[2] INAOE, Puebla 72840, Mexico
关键词
Bag of visual words; Visual vocabulary; Object categorization; Object recognition;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-25751-8_40
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Bag of Visual Words is one of the most widely used approaches for representing images for object categorization; however, it has several drawbacks. In this paper, we propose three properties and their corresponding quantitative evaluation measures to assess the ability of a visual word to represent and discriminate an object class. Additionally, we also introduce two methods for ranking and filtering visual vocabularies and a soft weighting method for BoW image representation. Experiments conducted on the Caltech-101 dataset showed the improvement introduced by our proposals, which obtained the best classification results for the highest compression rates when compared with a state-of-the-art mutual information based method for feature selection.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 338
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Functional representativeness and distinctiveness of reintroduced birds and mammals in Europe
    Charles Thévenin
    Maud Mouchet
    Alexandre Robert
    Christian Kerbiriou
    François Sarrazin
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [2] Functional representativeness and distinctiveness of reintroduced birds and mammals in Europe
    Thevenin, Charles
    Mouchet, Maud
    Robert, Alexandre
    Kerbiriou, Christian
    Sarrazin, Francois
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [3] From Text Vocabularies to Visual Vocabularies What Basis?
    Martinet, Jean
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (VISAPP 2014), VOL 2, 2014, : 668 - 675
  • [4] Assessing process distinctiveness
    Miller, N
    Pedersen, WC
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1999, 10 (02) : 150 - 156
  • [5] TOWARDS UNIVERSAL VISUAL VOCABULARIES
    Ries, Christian X.
    Romberg, Stefan
    Lienhart, Rainer
    [J]. 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA AND EXPO (ICME 2010), 2010, : 1067 - 1072
  • [6] Assessing the representativeness of health surveys
    Leyland, AH
    Finlayson, A
    Clark, D
    Dundas, R
    Whyte, B
    Craig, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 14 (04): : 45 - 45
  • [7] A methodology for assessing sample representativeness
    Ramsey, CA
    Hewitt, AD
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSICS, 2005, 6 (01) : 71 - 75
  • [8] VISUAL PROCESSING OF FACIAL DISTINCTIVENESS
    BENSON, PJ
    PERRETT, DI
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 1994, 23 (01) : 75 - 93
  • [9] VISUAL METAPHOR AND TRADEMARK DISTINCTIVENESS
    Marlan, Dustin
    [J]. WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 2018, 93 (02) : 767 - 826
  • [10] Assessing and Improving the Quality of SKOS Vocabularies
    Suominen, Osma
    Mader, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL ON DATA SEMANTICS, 2014, 3 (01) : 47 - 73