Analysis of process parameters of electrochemical micromachining by using response surface methodology

被引:1
|
作者
Maniraj, S. [1 ]
Thanigaivelan, R. [2 ]
Kannan, R. [3 ]
Babu, N. Ramesh [1 ]
Ramesh, N. [1 ]
Raja, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paavai Engn Coll Autonomous, Dept Mech Engn, Namakkal, India
[2] Muthayammal Engn Coll Autonomous, Dept Mech Engn, Namakkal, India
[3] PSNA Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Electrochemical micromachining; Metal removal rate; Radial over cut; RSM; MULTIRESPONSE OPTIMIZATION; TAGUCHI; COMPOSITES;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.841
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research paper presents the machinability of ground-granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) which is reinforced with aluminum 6061 metal matrix composites using electrochemical micromachining (EMM). EMM process is the most prominently utilized machining process in various fields of micro fabrications in aerospace technology, automobile and other industrial applications. In this research a central composite design was adopted while designing the experiments. Temperature of the electrode, voltage, electrolyte concentration and percentage composition of reinforcement (6%, 9% and12% GGBS) are chosen as the input machining parameters. Radial overcut (ROC) and material removal rate (MRR) are considered as response parameters. Additionally, multi criterion decision making namely grey relational analysis (GRA) is utilized to find out the optimal input parameters. From GRA, the optimal parameters are 400C, 12 V, 25 g/l and 9% of GGBS composition. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Advances in Materials Research-2019.
引用
收藏
页码:2430 / 2434
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology: A review
    Chelladurai, Samson Jerold Samuel
    Murugan, K.
    Ray, Abhra Pratip
    Upadhyaya, Makarand
    Narasimharaj, Venugopal
    Gnanasekaran, S.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 37 : 1301 - 1304
  • [2] Investigation into electrochemical micromachining (EMM) through response surface methodology based approach
    Jagannath Munda
    Bijoy Bhattacharyya
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 35 : 821 - 832
  • [3] Investigation into electrochemical micromachining (EMM) through response surface methodology based approach
    Munda, Jagannath
    Bhattacharyya, Bijoy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 35 (7-8): : 821 - 832
  • [4] Performance analysis of process parameters on machining α-β titanium alloy in electrochemical micromachining process
    Geethapriyan, T.
    Kalaichelvan, K.
    Muthuramalingam, T.
    Rajadurai, A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2018, 232 (09) : 1577 - 1589
  • [5] Sugar beet industry process wastewater treatment using electrochemical methods and optimization of parameters using response surface methodology
    Sharma, Swati
    Simsek, Halis
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2020, 238
  • [6] Optimization of the Parameters of the Magnetic Filtration Process Using Response Surface Methodology
    Yildiz, Zehra
    [J]. TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2011, 90 (03) : 965 - 975
  • [7] Optimization of the Parameters of the Magnetic Filtration Process Using Response Surface Methodology
    Zehra Yildiz
    [J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2011, 90 : 965 - 975
  • [8] Optimization of inulin production process parameters using response surface methodology
    Wasim Akram
    Navneet Garud
    [J]. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6
  • [9] Optimization of inulin production process parameters using response surface methodology
    Akram, Wasim
    Garud, Navneet
    [J]. FUTURE JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [10] Optimization of A-TIG process parameters using response surface methodology
    Vidyarthy, Ravi Shanker
    Dwivedi, Dheerendra Kumar
    Muthukumaran, Vasudevan
    [J]. MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2018, 33 (07) : 709 - 717