Nasogastric tube feeding and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer

被引:51
|
作者
Nugent, B. [1 ]
Parker, M. J. [2 ]
McIntyre, I. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Belfast City Hosp, No Ireland Canc Ctr, Belfast Hlth & Social Care Trust, Belfast BT9 7AB, Ireland
[2] Royal Grp Hosp Trust, Educ & Res Ctr, No Ireland Clin Res Support Ctr, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Univ Ulster, Sch Hlth Sci, Newtownabbey, North Ireland
关键词
BMI; enteral feeding; head and neck cancer; FLUOROSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; ENTERAL NUTRITION; WEIGHT-LOSS; RADIOTHERAPY; PLACEMENT; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; MALNUTRITION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01047.x
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: For patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer, oral nutrition may not provide adequate nutrition during radical radiotherapy or chemoradiation treatment, resulting in enteral feeding initiation. Enteral feeding may be delivered via a nasogastric tube or by a gastrostomy tube. The present study aimed to determine how different treatment modalities impact on requirement for enteral feeding and which method of enteral feeding provided the most benefit to the patient, as demonstrated by weight loss and the number of unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions. Methods: Patients who were treated with radical radiotherapy or chemoradiation between January 2004 and June 2007 were reviewed retrospectively (n = 196, male = 149, female = 47). Data were collected on demographics, diagnosis, T and N classification, nutritional status, unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions, and type and duration of enteral feeding. Subjects were divided into three subgroups depending on the treatment received. Comparisons were then made between methods of enteral feeding. Results: Combined modality treatment (Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation) results in a higher proportion of patients requiring enteral feeding (66-71% compared to 12% for radiotherapy). Patients fed via a prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy lost the least amount of weight during treatment (-4.6% to +1.4%), although the method of enteral feeding did not statistically influence weight difference at the end of treatment. The enteral feeding method did not influence unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions. Conclusions: Combined modality treatment results in a greater requirement for enteral feeding, with these patient groups having the greatest weight loss. The findings obtained in the present study indicate that the method of enteral feeding did not statistically influence weight loss at the end of treatment or unscheduled radiotherapy treatment interruptions.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 284
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review
    Wang, Jinfeng
    Liu, Minjie
    Liu, Chao
    Ye, Yun
    Huang, Guanhong
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (03) : 559 - 567
  • [2] Use of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding Support in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Kasozi, R.
    Choudhary, A.
    Andrus, K.
    Wong, R.
    Randall, R.
    Orovets, C.
    Bali, G. S.
    Karapetyan, L.
    Gibson, M. K.
    Fu, P.
    Sloan, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (05): : 1401 - 1402
  • [3] Comparison between nasogastric tube feeding and percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer patients
    Magné, N
    Marcy, PY
    Foa, C
    Falewee, MN
    Schneider, M
    Demard, F
    Bensadoun, RJ
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 258 (02) : 89 - 92
  • [4] Comparison between nasogastric tube feeding and percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer patients
    Nicolas Magné
    P. Y. Marcy
    C. Foa
    M. N. Falewee
    M. Schneider
    F. Demard
    R. J. Bensadoun
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2001, 258 : 89 - 92
  • [5] Gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for chemoradiation patients with head and neck cancer: the TUBE pilot RCT
    Paleri, Vinidh
    Patterson, Joanne
    Rousseau, Nikki
    Moloney, Eoin
    Craig, Dawn
    Tzelis, Dimitrios
    Wilkinson, Nina
    Franks, Jeremy
    Hynes, Ann Marie
    Heaven, Ben
    Hamilton, David
    Guerrero-Urbano, Teresa
    Donnelly, Rachael
    Barclay, Stewart
    Rapley, Tim
    Stocken, Deborah
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 22 (16) : 1 - +
  • [6] FEEDING VIA NASOGASTRIC TUBE OR PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY - A COMPARISON
    BAETEN, C
    HOEFNAGELS, J
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 27 : 95 - 98
  • [7] Use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding support in head and neck cancer patients.
    Kasozi, Ramla Namisango
    Choudhary, Anita
    Andrus, Kelly
    Wong, Richard C. K.
    Randall, Rory Eric
    Orovets, Catherine Marie
    Bali, Gurvinder
    Karapetyan, Lilit
    Gibson, Michael K.
    Fu, Ping
    Sloan, Jesse
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [8] Feeding in Oral Cancer Patients After Massive Ablative Surgery: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy or Nasogastric Tube
    Tabrizi, Reza
    Hosseinpour, Sepanta
    Taghizadeh, Fateme
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 27 (04) : 1010 - 1011
  • [9] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances
    Gomes, Claudio A. R., Jr.
    Lustosa, Suzana A. S.
    Matos, Delcio
    Andriolo, Regis B.
    Waisberg, Daniel R.
    Waisberg, Jaques
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (03):
  • [10] Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances
    Gomes, Claudio A. R., Jr.
    Silva Lustosa, Suzana Angelica
    Matos, Delcio
    Andriolo, Regis B.
    Waisberg, Daniel R.
    Waisberg, Jaques
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (11):