The Evidence for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery Does It Make a Difference?

被引:212
|
作者
Fehlings, Michael G. [1 ]
Brodke, Darrel S. [2 ]
Norvell, Daniel C.
Dettori, Joseph R.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Neurosurg, Spine Program, Neurosci Program, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
SSEP; MEP; neuromonitoring; spine surgery; spinal cord injury; SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRIC MOTOR; SCOLIOSIS SURGERY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CONSECUTIVE SERIES; RISK-FACTORS; CORD-INJURY; DEFORMITY; IDENTIFICATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d8338e
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. The objective of this article was to undertake a systematic review of the literature to determine whether IOM is able to sensitively and specifically detect intraoperative neurologic injury during spine surgery and to assess whether IOM results in improved outcomes for patients during these procedures. Summary and Background Data. Although relatively uncommon, perioperative neurologic injury, in particular spinal cord injury, is one of the most feared complications of spinal surgery. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) has been proposed as a method which could reduce perioperative neurologic complications after spine surgery. Methods. A systematic review of the English language literature was undertaken for articles published between 1990 and March 2009. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Collaborative Library databases were searched, as were the reference lists of published articles examining the use of IOM in spine surgery. Two independent reviewers assessed the level of evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results. A total of 103 articles were initially screened and 32 ultimately met the predetermined inclusion criteria. We determined that there is a high level of evidence that multimodal IOM is sensitive and specific for detecting intraoperative neurologic injury during spine surgery. There is a low level of evidence that IOM reduces the rate of new or worsened perioperative neurologic deficits. There is very low evidence that an intraoperative response to a neuromonitoring alert reduces the rate of perioperative neurologic deterioration. Conclusion. Based on strong evidence that multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (MIOM) is sensitive and specific for detecting intraoperative neurologic injury during spine surgery, it is recommended that the use of MIOM be considered in spine surgery where the spinal cord or nerve roots are deemed to be at risk, including procedures involving deformity correction and procedures that require the placement of instrumentation. There is a need to develop evidence-based protocols to deal with intraoperative changes in MIOM and to validate these prospectively.
引用
收藏
页码:S37 / S46
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery
    Imirizaldu, L.
    Urriza, J.
    Olaziregi, O.
    Hidalgo, A.
    Pabon, R. M.
    [J]. ANALES DEL SISTEMA SANITARIO DE NAVARRA, 2009, 32 : 125 - 133
  • [2] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Deformity Surgery
    Hwang S.W.
    Malhotra N.R.
    Shaffrey C.I.
    Samdani A.F.
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2012, 1 (Suppl 1) : 64 - 70
  • [3] The Use of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery
    Charalampidis, Anastasios
    Jiang, Fan
    Wilson, Jamie R. F.
    Badhiwala, Jetan H.
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 104S - 114S
  • [4] Overview of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Spine Surgery
    Shilian, Parastou
    Zada, Gabriel
    Kim, Aaron C.
    Gonzalez, Andres A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (04) : 333 - 339
  • [5] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review
    Gonzalez, Andres A.
    Jeyanandarajan, Dhiraj
    Hansen, Chris
    Zada, Gabriel
    Hsieh, Patrick C.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2009, 27 (04) : E6.1 - E6.10
  • [6] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in aneurysm clipping: Does it make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nasi, Davide
    Meletti, Stefano
    Tramontano, Vincenzo
    Pavesi, Giacomo
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 196
  • [7] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of surgeries at the cervical spine
    Weisz, DJ
    Yang, BY
    Fung, K
    Agudelo, E
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 5 (02): : 85 - 94
  • [8] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist
    Lall, Rishi R.
    Lall, Rohan R.
    Hauptman, Jason S.
    Munoz, Carlos
    Cybulski, George R.
    Koski, Tyler
    Ganju, Aruna
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 33 (05)
  • [9] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Daniel, Jefferson Walter
    Botelho, Ricardo Vieira
    Milano, Jeronimo Buzetti
    Dantas, Fernando Rolemberg
    Onishi, Franz Jooji
    Neto, Eloy Rusafa
    Bertolini, Eduardo de Freitas
    Duva Borgheresi, Marcelo Antonio
    Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (16) : 1154 - 1160
  • [10] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery
    Park, Jong-Hwa
    Hyun, Seung-Jae
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2015, 3 (09) : 765 - 773