Quantification of parametric uncertainty of ANN models with GLUE method for different streamflow dynamics

被引:20
|
作者
Tongal, Hakan [1 ]
Booij, Martijn J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Civil Engn, Isparta, Turkey
[2] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, Dept Water Engn & Management, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE); Parametric uncertainty; Bootstrap; Artificial neural networks; Uncertainty measures; Rhine Basin; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY; RHINE BASIN; LOW FLOWS; ENSEMBLE; IDENTIFICATION; INFLOW; FEEDFORWARD; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-017-1408-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study describes the parametric uncertainty of artificial neural networks ANNs) by employing the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. The ANNs are used to forecast daily streamflow for three sub-basins of the Rhine Basin East Alpine, Main, and Mosel) having different hydrological and climatological characteristics. We have obtained prior parameter distributions from 5000 ANNs in the training period to capture the parametric uncertainty and subsequently 125,000 correlated parameter sets were generated. These parameter sets were used to quantify the uncertainty in the forecasted streamflow in the testing period using three uncertainty measures: percentage of coverage, average relative length, and average asymmetry degree. The results indicated that the highest uncertainty was obtained for the Mosel sub-basin and the lowest for the East Alpine sub-basin mainly due to hydro-climatic differences between these basins. The prediction results and uncertainty estimates of the proposed methodology were compared to the direct ensemble and bootstrap methods. The GLUE method successfully captured the observed discharges with the generated prediction intervals, especially the peak flows. It was also illustrated that uncertainty bands are sensitive to the selection of the threshold value for the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency measure used in the GLUE method by employing the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1010
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantification of parametric uncertainty of ANN models with GLUE method for different streamflow dynamics
    Hakan Tongal
    Martijn J. Booij
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2017, 31 : 993 - 1010
  • [2] ONLINE QUANTIFICATION OF INPUT UNCERTAINTY FOR PARAMETRIC MODELS
    Zhou, Enlu
    Liu, Tianyi
    [J]. 2018 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2018, : 1587 - 1598
  • [3] ANN-based Representation of Parametric and Residual Uncertainty of Models
    Pianosi, Francesca
    Shrestha, Durga Lal
    Solomatine, Dimitri P.
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS IJCNN 2010, 2010,
  • [4] An uncertainty quantification method for nanomaterial prediction models
    [J]. Vanli, O.A. (avanli@fsu.edu), 1600, Springer London (70): : 1 - 4
  • [5] An uncertainty quantification method for nanomaterial prediction models
    O. Arda Vanli
    Li-Jen Chen
    Chao-his Tsai
    Chuck Zhang
    Ben Wang
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 70 : 33 - 44
  • [6] An uncertainty quantification method for nanomaterial prediction models
    Vanli, O. Arda
    Chen, Li-Jen
    Tsai, Chao-his
    Zhang, Chuck
    Wang, Ben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 70 (1-4): : 33 - 44
  • [7] AN EFFICIENT NUMERICAL METHOD FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN CARDIOLOGY MODELS
    Gao, Xindan
    Ying, Wenjun
    Zhang, Zhiwen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2019, 9 (03) : 275 - 294
  • [8] Streamflow, stomata, and soil pits: Sources of inference for complex models with fast, robust uncertainty quantification
    Dwelle, M. Chase
    Kim, Jongho
    Sargsyan, Khachik
    Ivanov, Valeriy Y.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2019, 125 : 13 - 31
  • [9] A Parametric Uncertainty Analysis Method for Markov Reliability and Reward Models
    Dhople, Sairaj V.
    Dominguez-Garcia, Alejandro D.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2012, 61 (03) : 634 - 648
  • [10] An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models
    Tatang, MA
    Pan, WW
    Prinn, RG
    McRae, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D18) : 21925 - 21932