Evolution of sexual isolation in laboratory populations: Fitness differences between mating types and the associated hybrid incompatibilities

被引:15
|
作者
Alipaz, JA
Karr, TL
Wu, CI
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Comm Evolut Biol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Organismal Biol & Anat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
AMERICAN NATURALIST | 2005年 / 165卷 / 04期
关键词
nascent speciation; fitness; sexual selection; Zimbabwe; Drosophila melanogaster;
D O I
10.1086/428407
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Drosophila melanogaster is known to have two races in the incipient stages of speciation that exhibit strong asymmetric premating isolation: Zimbabwe (Z) and cosmopolitan ( M). In a study examining the phenotypic and genotypic evolution after secondary contact, we found that despite strong sexual selection favoring the Z-type behavior, it is the M-type behavior that comes to dominate hybrid populations. This article examines the fitness costs associated with the Z-type behavior. We have discovered that these costs are great enough to explain the failure of the Z-type behavior to prosper. Here we report that Z-type females produce approximately half the number of offspring that M-type females produce. Furthermore, crosses between populations have revealed that Z-type females mated to M-type males have approximately 20% fewer offspring than the reciprocal crosses because of an inability of M-type sperm to successfully fertilize Z-type eggs. Hybrid crosses also exhibit much-reduced numbers of viable offspring in addition to reduced hybrid male fertility. These fitness effects suggest that multiple mechanisms of postmating isolation have evolved concurrently with the divergence in behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 438
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Evolution of mating isolation between populations of Drosophila ananassae
    Schug, Malcolm D.
    Baines, John F.
    Killon-Atwood, Amanda
    Mohanty, Sujata
    Das, Aparup
    Grath, Sonja
    Smith, Shelly G.
    Zargham, Shiva
    Mcevey, Shane F.
    Stephan, Wolfgang
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2008, 17 (11) : 2706 - 2721
  • [2] Do density-driven mating system differences explain reproductive incompatibilities between populations of a placental fish?
    Schrader, Matthew
    Travis, Joseph
    Fuller, Rebecca C.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2011, 20 (19) : 4140 - 4151
  • [3] Testing for mating isolation between ecotypes: laboratory experiments with lake, stream and hybrid stickleback
    Raeymaekers, J. A. M.
    Boisjoly, M.
    Delaire, L.
    Berner, D.
    Raesaenen, K.
    Hendry, A. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2010, 23 (12) : 2694 - 2708
  • [4] Evolution of sexual isolation during secondary contact: Genotypic versus phenotypic changes in laboratory populations
    Alipaz, JA
    Fang, S
    Osada, N
    Wu, CI
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2005, 165 (04): : 420 - 428
  • [5] GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION AND SEXUAL ISOLATION - MATING SYSTEMS BETWEEN JAPANESE AND FRENCH POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    PETIT, C
    KITAGAWA, O
    TAKAMURA, T
    [J]. ARCHIVES DE ZOOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE ET GENERALE, 1976, 117 (03): : 345 - 358
  • [6] Geographic differences in flash intervals and pre-mating isolation between populations of the Genji firefly, Luciola cruciata
    Tamura, M
    Yokoyama, J
    Ohba, N
    Kawata, M
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2005, 30 (02) : 241 - 245
  • [7] HOST-ASSOCIATED DIFFERENCES IN FITNESS WITHIN AND BETWEEN POPULATIONS OF A SEED BEETLE (BRUCHIDAE) - EFFECTS OF PLANT VARIABILITY
    SIEMENS, DH
    JOHNSON, CD
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1990, 82 (03) : 408 - 413
  • [8] Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory:: A re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis
    Noor, MAF
    Ortíz-Barrientos, D
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2006, 36 (02) : 322 - 327
  • [9] Simulating Natural Conditions in the Laboratory: A Re-Examination of Sexual Isolation between Sympatric and Allopatric Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis
    Mohamed A. F. Noor
    Daniel Ortíz-Barrientos
    [J]. Behavior Genetics, 2006, 36 : 322 - 327
  • [10] Do differences in life-history traits and the timing of peak mating activity between host-associated populations of Chilo suppressalis have a genetic basis?
    Quan, Wei-Li
    Liu, Wen
    Zhou, Rui-Qi
    Qureshi, Sundas Rana
    Ding, Nan
    Ma, Wei-Hua
    Lei, Chao-Liang
    Wang, Xiao-Ping
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 6 (13): : 4478 - 4487