BIT Problem: Is There a Trade-off in the Performances of Blockchain Systems?

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Shuangfeng [1 ]
Liu, Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Xingren [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Software Coll, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China
关键词
Blockchain; Impossibility triangle; Analysis method; Consensus mechanism; Security;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-15-2777-7_11
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Blockchain technology, as a revolutionary concept, born with Bitcoin, is triggering the start of a new era on information. It is generally recognized that the blockchain-based systems achieve high security in the process of information sharing in a distributed network, at the cost of low efficiency in terms of data throughput or high costs in consuming computational resources. A natural question we are interested in is whether there exists a trade-off principle between different performances of a blockchain system, which is also regarded as blockchain impossibility triangle (BIT) problem. In this paper, we propose an analysis method which can be used to verify the existence of the BIT. Our analysis method is composed of two layers. In the first layer the basic and core attributes are abstracted by building a consensus model, and in the second layer the analysis approach is designed to verify the existence of a BIT. Specifically, in the first layer, we firstly define a leaderless consensus model to quantitatively abstract the basic parameters in the process of system consensus, then three core attributes are justified to serve as the three vertices of the discussed triangle problem, namely security, cost, and efficiency. Based on the core attributes, we propose the credibility metric which measures the difficulty of achieving credible consensus for a given blockchain system. In the second layer, we analyze the existence of BIT, where we have demonstrated the conditions that a BIT exists and the conditions that the triangle does not exist. Finally, the proposed analysis method is applied in analyzing PoW based blockchain systems, where we have shown that there is no BIT problem in PoW based systems. Furthermore, the proposed analysis method can also help the blockchain developers in finding the promising directions of a new blockchain consensus mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 136
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Taxonomy for The Trade-off Problem in Distributed Telemedicine Systems
    Janki, Zoltan Richard
    Bilicki, Vilmos
    ACTA CYBERNETICA, 2021, 25 (02): : 285 - 306
  • [2] TRADE-OFF TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
    Tsvetkov, V. Ya.
    NEWS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN-SERIES OF GEOLOGY AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES, 2019, (03): : 109 - 113
  • [3] TRADE-OFF RELATIONS IN A MIN MAX PROBLEM
    PURI, MC
    BANSAL, S
    NEW ZEALAND OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1980, 8 (01): : 73 - 81
  • [4] The trade-off
    Rothschild, M
    COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, 2004, 41 (09): : 19 - 21
  • [5] NO TRADE-OFF
    NICOLINI, M
    NATION, 1977, 224 (20) : 610 - 610
  • [6] TRADE-OFF
    MANKIW, NG
    NEW REPUBLIC, 1991, 204 (13) : 4 - 4
  • [7] Blockchain mining in pools: Analyzing the trade-off between profitability and ruin
    Albrecher, Hansjoerg
    Finger, Dina
    Goffard, Pierre-O.
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2022, 105 : 313 - 335
  • [8] MULTICHIP SYSTEMS TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS TOOL
    SANDBORN, PA
    GHOSH, R
    DRAKE, K
    ABADIR, M
    BAL, L
    PARIKH, A
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC TESTING-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1994, 5 (2-3): : 207 - 218
  • [9] Uncertainty trade-off and disturbance trade-off for quantum measurements
    Srinivas, M. D.
    Mandayam, Prabha
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2015, 109 (11): : 2044 - 2051
  • [10] Nonlinear Optimal Trade-Off Control for LQG Problem
    Qian, Fucai
    Xie, Guo
    Liu, Ding
    Xie, Wenfang
    2010 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2010, : 1931 - 1936