Obesity in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Systematic Review and Legal Assessment

被引:4
|
作者
Ploeger, Milena M. [1 ]
Mueller, Norbert H. [2 ]
Wirtz, Dieter Christian [1 ]
Kohlhof, Hendrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klin Bonn, Klin Orthopadie & Unfallchirurg, Sigmund Freud Str 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[2] Kanzlei Klostermann, Dr Schmidt, Monstadt, Dr Eisbrecher, Bochum, Germany
来源
关键词
obesity; revision total joint arthroplasty; knee; systematic; review; BODY-MASS INDEX; PRIMARY OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP; REPLACEMENT; OVERWEIGHT; COHORT; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/a-0590-5340
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In recent years, the incidence of overweight and obesity has increased in the German population. Thus the number of obese patients treated with primary total joint arthroplasty has also increased. It is therefore predicted that the number of obese patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty will also increase. Nevertheless almost every manufacturer of commercially available revision arthroplasty implants states in his product safety guarantee that obesity is a relative or absolute contraindication. Data on revision total joint arthroplasty in obese patients are sparse. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the current literature on re-revision rate, infection rate, postoperative clinical outcome, and implant survival rate in obese patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty. Moreover, potential legal consequences and aspects are discussed which are essential for the surgeon. Material and Methods We conducted a systematic review of the online databases PubMed and identified clinical studies on obesity and overweight in revision total knee arthroplasty. Study quality was assessed using levels of evidence and the modified Jadad score. We also included descriptive data on case numbers, age, gender, height, weight and follow-up time. Current legal aspects were also analysed. Results/Discussion Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The average Jadad score was 1, the average level of evidence 3. In two studies, infection and revision occured more often in obese patients. Patients with morbid obesity had a higher risk of wound revision and periprosthetic joint infections. Three studies showed that obese patients had significantly lower scores for clinical outcome measures in function and pain. The legal aspect was not discussed in any of the five studies. Overall, published data are sparse and very heterogeneous. Therefore comparing these five studies is difficult. However, the results of our review suggest that obesity in revision total knee arthroplasty may have a negative influence on reoperation rate, infection rate and postoperative functional outcome. From a legal point of view, potential weight limitations of the implants intented for use have to be part of the oral preoperative discussion. The patient's informed consent has to be received and documented prior to revision total joint arthroplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 442
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tibial tubercle osteotomy in revision total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review
    Chalidis, Byron
    Kitridis, Dimitrios
    Givissis, Panagiotis
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 11 (06): : 294 - 303
  • [2] Cost of septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Charles Okafor
    Brent Hodgkinson
    Son Nghiem
    Christopher Vertullo
    Joshua Byrnes
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [3] Cost of septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Okafor, Charles
    Hodgkinson, Brent
    Nghiem, Son
    Vertullo, Christopher
    Byrnes, Joshua
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [4] National Obesity Trends in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Odum, Susan M.
    Van Doren, Bryce A.
    Springer, Bryan D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (09): : S136 - S139
  • [5] Intraoperative assessment in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Rand, JA
    Ries, MD
    Landis, GH
    Rosenberg, AG
    Haas, S
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A : 26 - 37
  • [6] Outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (Review)
    Roman, Mihai Dan
    Russu, Octav
    Mohor, Calin
    Necula, Radu
    Boicean, Adrian
    Todor, Adrian
    Mohor, Cosmin
    Fleaca, Sorin Radu
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [7] Inferior outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Jin Kyu
    Kim, Hyun Jung
    Park, Jae Ok
    Yang, Jae-Hyuk
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (11) : 3403 - 3418
  • [8] Inferior outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jin Kyu Lee
    Hyun Jung Kim
    Jae Ok Park
    Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2018, 26 : 3403 - 3418
  • [9] Isolated Femoral or Tibial Component Revision in Total Knee Arthroplasty:A Systematic Review
    Maestri, Marco
    Castagnini, Francesco
    Giardina, Federico
    Tella, Giuseppe
    Tassinari, Enrico
    Traina, Francesco
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2023, 32 (4-5) : 225 - 231
  • [10] Revision total knee arthroplasty - Morselized allografting in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Whiteside, LA
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 21 (09) : 1041 - 1043