Comparative Analysis of Texture Patterns on Mammograms for Classification

被引:1
|
作者
Darapureddy, Nagadevi [1 ]
Karatapu, Nagaprakash [2 ]
Battula, Tirumala Krishna [3 ]
机构
[1] Chaitanya Bharathi Inst Technol, ECE Dept, Hyderabad 500075, Telangana, India
[2] Gudlavalleru Engn Coll, ECE Dept, Gudlavalleru 521356, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] Jawaharlal Nehru Technol Univ, ECE Dept, Kakinada 533005, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
texture patterns; classification; machine learning algorithms; accuracy; local binary pattern variants; mammograms; local directional order pattern; local wavelet pattern; DESCRIPTOR;
D O I
10.18280/ts.380215
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is a cancerous tumor that arrives within the tissues of the breast. Women are mostly attacked than men. To detect early cancer medical specialists, suggest mammography for screening. Algorithms in Machine learning were executed on mammogram images to classify whether the tissues are deleterious or not. An analysis is done based on the texture feature extraction using different techniques like Frequency decoded local binary pattern (FDLBP), Local Bit-plane Decoded Pattern (LBDP), Local Diagonal Extrema Pattern (LDEP), Local Directional Order Pattern (LDOP), Local Wavelet Pattern (LWP). The features extracted are tested on 322 images from MIA's database of three different classes. The algorithms in Machine learning like K-Nearest Neighbor classifier (KNN), Support vector classifier (SVC), Decision Tree classifier (DTC), Random Forest classifier (RFC), AdaBoost classifier (AC), Gradient Boosting classifier (GBC), Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier (GNB), Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis classifier (QDA) were used to evaluate the accuracy of classification. This paper examines the comparison of accuracy using different texture features. KNN algorithm with LDEP for texture feature extraction gives classification accuracy of 64.61%, SVC with all the texture patterns mentioned gives classification accuracy of 63.07%, DTC with FDLBP, LBDP gives classification accuracy of 47.69, RFC with LBDP and AC with LDOP and GBC with FDLBP gives 61.53% classification accuracy, GNB and LDA with FDLBP gives 60% and 63.07% classification accuracy respectively, QDA with LBDP gives 64.61 classification accuracy. Of all the Algorithms support vector classifier gives good accuracy results with all the texture patterns mentioned.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 386
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classification of GRF texture in mammograms through discreminat analysis
    Merouani, H
    McCall, J
    MacKenzie, I
    Gilbert, F
    [J]. SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND ITS APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 673 - 676
  • [2] Comparative of shape and texture features in classification of breast masses in digitized mammograms
    Kinoshita, SK
    Marques, PMA
    Frère, AF
    Marana, HRC
    Ferrari, RJ
    Pereira, RR
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 3979 : 872 - 879
  • [3] Usefulness of Texture Analysis for Computerized Classification of Breast Lesions on Mammograms
    Roberto R. Pereira
    Paulo M. Azevedo Marques
    Marcelo O. Honda
    Sergio K. Kinoshita
    Roger Engelmann
    Chisako Muramatsu
    Kunio Doi
    [J]. Journal of Digital Imaging, 2007, 20 : 248 - 255
  • [4] Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms
    Pereira, Roberto R., Jr.
    Marques, Paulo M. Azevedo
    Honda, Marcelo O.
    Kinoshita, Sergio K.
    Engelmann, Roger
    Muramatsu, Chisako
    Doi, Kunio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2007, 20 (03) : 248 - 255
  • [5] Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms
    Li, H
    Giger, ML
    Olopade, OI
    Margolis, A
    Lan, L
    Bonta, L
    [J]. CARS 2004: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 1268 : 878 - 881
  • [6] Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms
    Li, H
    Giger, ML
    Olopade, OI
    Margolis, A
    Chinander, MR
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (07) : 863 - 873
  • [7] Classification of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using multiscale statistical texture analysis
    Kramer, Dani
    Aghdasi, Farzin
    [J]. Proceedings of the South African Symposium on Communications and Signal Processing, COMSIG, 1998, : 121 - 126
  • [8] Hybrid Gabor based Local Binary Patterns Texture Features for classification of Breast Mammograms
    AlQoud, Amal
    Jaffar, M. Arfan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2016, 16 (04): : 16 - 21
  • [9] Classification of microcalcifications in digitised mammograms using multiscale statistical texture analysis
    Kramer, D
    Aghdasi, F
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1998 SOUTH AFRICAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING: COMSIG '98, 1998, : 121 - 126
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of Texture Descriptors for Classification
    Ahmed, Masood
    Shaukat, Arslan
    Akram, M. Usman
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES (IST), 2016, : 24 - 29