Natural Scene Statistics of Mammography Accreditation Phantom Images

被引:0
|
作者
Corchuelo Guzman, Valentina [1 ]
Benitez Restrepo, Hernan Darfo [2 ]
Salazar Hurtado, Edison [3 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Javeriana Calo, Dept Hlth Sci, Cali, Colombia
[2] Pontificia Univ Javeriana Cali, Dept Elect & Comp Sci, Cali, Colombia
[3] Ctr Med Imbanaco, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Cali, Colombia
关键词
quality assessment; Mammography; Phantom; Medical image; Statistics;
D O I
10.1109/stsiva.2019.8730289
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Image quality assessment (IQA) protocol ensures that mammography equipment operates according to its design standards. IQA permits to detect alterations in the equipment that may impact negatively the interpretation of mammograms. The mammography accreditation phantom simulates the radiographic attenuation of an average-size compressed breast and contains structures that model very basic image characteristics of breast parenchyma and cancer. It is composed of a poly-methylmethacrylate (PMMA) block 4.5 mm thick and a wax insert. The wax insert contains six disks, fibers, and calcifications. To pass the image quality standards for screen mammography, at least four fibers, three calcification groups, and three masses must be clearly visible by a human reader (with no obvious artifacts) at an average glandular dose of less than 2.5 mGy. Predicting human performance in quality control process is critical for task efficacy. In this paper, as a first step to predict automatically human performance in the recognition of structures, we analyze under different acquisition conditions the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the different types of structures present in a phantom MG image (PMGI) and the extraction of Natural Scene Statistics (NSS) from a PMGI.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QUANTITATIVE VERSUS SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF MAMMOGRAPHY ACCREDITATION PHANTOM IMAGES
    CHAKRABORTY, DP
    ECKERT, MP
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (02) : 133 - 143
  • [2] Computational assessment of mammography accreditation phantom images and correlation with human observer analysis
    Barufaldi, Bruno
    Lau, Kristen C.
    Schiabel, Homero
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 9416
  • [3] Which Phantom Is Better for Assessing the Image Quality in Full-Field Digital Mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation Phantom versus Digital Mammography Accreditation Phantom
    Song, Sung Eun
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    Yie, An
    Ku, Bon Kyung
    Kim, Hee-Young
    Cho, Kyu Ran
    Chung, Hwan Hoon
    Lee, Seung Hwa
    Hwang, Kyu-Won
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 13 (06) : 776 - 783
  • [4] Mammography Accreditation Phantom Variation: Effects On Quality Control Measurements
    Fisher, R.
    Hulme, K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3103 - 3103
  • [5] Effectiveness RMI-156 Mammography Accreditation Phantom in Evaluating Digital Mammography Systems
    Rajapakshe, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (09) : 4305 - 4305
  • [7] Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI)
    Chakraborty, DP
    [J]. PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING - MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3032 : 292 - 299
  • [8] Statistics of natural scene structures and scene categorization
    Xin Chen
    Weibing Wan
    Zhiyong Yong
    [J]. BMC Neuroscience, 13 (Suppl 1)
  • [9] Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation
    Haus, AG
    Yaffe, MJ
    Feig, SA
    Hendrick, RE
    Butler, PA
    Wilcox, PA
    Bansal, S
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (11) : 2297 - 2301
  • [10] Non-uniformity Correction of IR Images using Natural Scene Statistics
    Goodall, Todd
    Bovik, Alan C.
    Vikalo, Haris
    Paulter, Nicholas G., Jr.
    [J]. 2015 IEEE GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (GLOBALSIP), 2015, : 230 - 234