Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:55
|
作者
El-Nashar, Sherif A. [1 ]
Shazly, Sherif A. [1 ]
Hopkins, Matthew R. [1 ]
Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N. [1 ]
Famuyide, Abimbola O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
cervical cancer screening; cervical dysplasia; colposcopy; Pap test; ADENOCARCINOMA IN-SITU; COMPARING; 3; TECHNIQUES; ENDOCERVICAL CURETTAGE; MANAGEMENT; DYSPLASIA; LEEP; HETEROGENEITY; RADIOSURGERY; OUTCOMES; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1097/LGT.0000000000000287
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: This meta-analysis compared loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) with cold-knife conization (CKC) for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations. Material and Methods: A literature search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception until April 2015. We included clinical trials and cohort studies comparing CKC with LEEP for treating CIN. The primary outcome was a combined end point of persistent CIN (<6 months after conization) and recurrent CIN (>6 months). Secondary outcomes included procedural, pathologic, and long-term outcomes. Pooled relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used to report binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: Among 26 studies, the incidence of persistent and recurrent disease after LEEP was comparable with that after CKC (15.6% vs 7.38%; RR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.00-1.81). Loop electrosurgical excision procedure was faster, caused less intraoperative bleeding, and resulted in shorter hospital stay (WMD, 9.5 minutes [95% CI = 6.4-12.6 minutes]; WMD, 42.4 mL [95% CI = 21.3-106 mL]; and WMD, 1.5 days [95% CI = 1.1-1.8 days], respectively). Loop electrosurgical excision procedure cones were shallower with overall less volume and weight than CKC (WMD, 5.1 mm [95% CI = 3.2-7.1 mm]; 2.6 mm(3) [95% CI = 0.6-5.7 mm(3)]; and 2.6 g [95% CI = 1.4-3.7 g], respectively). During follow-up, LEEP was associated with less cervical stenosis and fewer unsatisfactory examinations; however, this was not statistically significant (RR, 0.5 [95% CI = 0.1-1.5]; RR, 0.7 [95% CI = 0.4-1.2], respectively). Conclusions: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure is an acceptable alternative to CKC in women with CIN and unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations. Close follow-up is necessary for prompt detection and treatment of persistent or recurrent disease.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Jiang, Yan-Ming
    Chen, Chang-Xian
    Li, Li
    [J]. ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 3907 - 3915
  • [2] Pregnancy Outcome after the Treatment of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure or Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Liu, Yi
    Qiu, Hai Fan
    Tang, Yunbing
    Chen, Jie
    Lv, Jieqiang
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2014, 77 (04) : 240 - 244
  • [3] Can LEEP replace cold knife conization for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with unsatisfactory colposcopic examination? A systematic review and a meta-analysis
    El-Nashar, S.
    Hopkins, M.
    Cliby, W.
    Famuyide, A.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : S105 - S105
  • [4] Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Yanming
    Chen, Changxian
    Li, Li
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [5] Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia - Can it replace cold knife conization?
    Eduardo, AM
    VanDinh, T
    Hannigan, EV
    Yandell, RB
    Schnadig, VJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 41 (10) : 729 - 732
  • [6] Cold-knife conization versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for treatment of cervical dysplasia
    Bozanovic, T.
    Ljubic, A.
    Momcilov, P.
    Milicevic, S.
    Mostic, T.
    Atanackovic, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 29 (01) : 83 - 85
  • [7] Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization
    Michelin, M. A.
    Merino, L. M.
    Franco, C. A.
    Murta, E. F. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 36 (01): : 17 - 19
  • [8] Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Takac, I
    Gorisek, B
    [J]. TUMORI, 1999, 85 (04) : 243 - 246
  • [9] Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: A randomized, prospective study
    Duggan, BD
    Felix, JC
    Muderspach, LI
    Gebhardt, JA
    Groshen, S
    Morrow, P
    Roman, LD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (02) : 276 - 282
  • [10] Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Shin, Jin Woo
    Rho, Hyun Seok
    Park, Chan Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (01) : 126 - 130