Demand effects of consumers' stated and revealed preferences

被引:11
|
作者
Engstrom, Per [1 ]
Forsell, Eskil [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Econ, Box 513, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Econ, Box 6501, SE-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Peer effects; Observational learning; Network effects; Stated preferences; Revealed preferences; eWOM; Google play; Android apps; Regression discontinuity design; Instrumental variable analysis; WORD-OF-MOUTH; REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY DESIGNS; FIELD EXPERIMENT; EXPERT REVIEWS; REPUTATION; EBAY; MARKET; SALES; SALIENCE; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2018.04.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Knowledge of how consumers react to different signals is fundamental to understanding how markets work. The modern electronic marketplace has revolutionized the possibilities for consumers to gather detailed information about products and services before purchase. Specifically, a consumer can easily - through a host of online forums and evaluation sites - estimate a product's quality based on either (i) what other users say about the product (stated preferences) or (ii) how many other users that have bought the product (revealed preferences). In this paper, we compare the causal effects on demand from these two signals based on data from the biggest marketplace for Android apps, Google play. This data consists of daily information, for 42 consecutive days, of more than 500,000 apps from the US version of Google play. Our main result is that consumers are much more responsive to other consumers' revealed preferences, compared to others' stated preferences. A 10 percentile increase in displayed average rating only increases downloads by about 3%, while a 10 percentile increase in displayed number of downloads increases downloads by about 25%. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 61
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Waiting To Give: Stated and Revealed Preferences
    Craig, Ashley C.
    Garbarino, Ellen
    Heger, Stephanie A.
    Slonim, Robert
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (11) : 3672 - 3690
  • [2] Demand modeling with revealed and stated preferences: A travel cost model with contingent choke prices.
    Bowker, JM
    Park, TA
    Leeworthy, VR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 26 (02): : 560 - 560
  • [3] Stated and revealed preferences in companion animal choice
    Samantha E. Cohen
    Peter M. Todd
    [J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2019, 51 : 1498 - 1509
  • [4] Will consumers really pay for green electricity? Comparing stated and revealed preferences for residential programs in the United States
    Knapp, Lauren
    O'Shaughnessy, Eric
    Heeter, Jenny
    Mills, Sarah
    DeCicco, John M.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 65
  • [5] WOMEN AND ACTIVE TRAVEL: REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCES
    Crist, Katie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2019, 14 : S31 - S32
  • [6] Stated and revealed preferences in companion animal choice
    Cohen, Samantha E.
    Todd, Peter M.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 51 (04) : 1498 - 1509
  • [7] Are stated preferences convergent with revealed preferences? Empirical evidence from Nigeria
    Urama, Kevin C.
    Hodge, Ian D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 59 (01) : 24 - 37
  • [8] My favourite is not on the shelf: effects of the revealed-preference bundle on consumers' stated choice
    Hu, Wuyang
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 35 (01) : 29 - 50
  • [9] Revealed and stated preferences for reliable commuter rail in Norway
    Halse, Askill Harkjerr
    Ostli, Vegard
    Killi, Marit
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION LETTERS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (04): : 288 - 292
  • [10] Stated versus revealed preferences: An approach to reduce bias
    de Corte, Kaat
    Cairns, John
    Grieve, Richard
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 30 (05) : 1095 - 1123