Emergence of the benefits and costs of grouping for visual search

被引:2
|
作者
Wu, Rachel [1 ]
McGee, Brianna [1 ]
Rubenstein, Madelyn [2 ]
Pruitt, Zoe [2 ]
Cheung, Olivia S.
Aslin, Richard N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Psychol, 900 Univ Ave, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Brain & Cognit Sci, Rochester, NY USA
[3] New York Univ Abu Dhabi, Sci Div, Psychol, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
categorization; N2pc; visual search; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; ATTENTIONAL SELECTION; WORKING-MEMORY; OBJECTS; ITEM;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.13087
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study investigated how grouping related items leads to the emergence of benefits (facilitation when related items are search targets) and costs (interference when related items are distractors) in visual search. Participants integrated different views (related items) of a novel Lego object via (a) assembling the object, (b) disassembling the object, or (c) sitting quietly without explicit instructions. An omnibus ANOVA revealed that neural responses (N2pc ERP) for attentional selection increased between pretest to posttest regardless of the training condition when a specific target view appeared (benefit) and when a nontarget view from the same object as the target view appeared (cost). Bonferroni-corrected planned comparisons revealed that assembling the object (but not disassembling the object or no training) had a significant impact from pretest to posttest, although the ANOVA did not reveal any interaction effects, suggesting that the effects might not differ across training conditions. This study is one of the first to demonstrate the emergence of the costs and benefits of grouping novel targets on visual search efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GROUPING EFFECTS IN VISUAL-SEARCH
    ROSS, WD
    MINGOLLA, E
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1994, 35 (04) : 2081 - 2081
  • [2] Preattentive visual search and perceptual grouping in schizophrenia
    Carr, VJ
    Dewis, SAM
    Lewin, TJ
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1998, 79 (02) : 151 - 162
  • [3] TARGET AND NONTARGET GROUPING IN VISUAL-SEARCH
    DUNCAN, J
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1995, 57 (01): : 117 - 120
  • [4] Target grouping in visual search for multiple digits
    Kenith V. Sobel
    Amrita M. Puri
    Jared Hogan
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2015, 77 : 67 - 77
  • [5] Grouping effects on spatial attention in visual search
    Kim, MS
    Cave, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 126 (04): : 326 - 352
  • [6] AGING AND SIMILARITY GROUPING IN VISUAL-SEARCH
    GILMORE, GC
    TOBIAS, TR
    ROYER, FL
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1985, 40 (05): : 586 - 592
  • [7] Perceptual grouping and motion coherence in visual search
    Kingstone, A
    Bischof, WF
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (02) : 151 - 156
  • [8] GROUPING BY MOTION IS NOT MANDATORY IN VISUAL-SEARCH
    GANCARZ, G
    WOLFE, JM
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S900 - S900
  • [9] Target grouping in visual search for multiple digits
    Sobel, Kenith V.
    Puri, Amrita M.
    Hogan, Jared
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2015, 77 (01) : 67 - 77
  • [10] Attentional costs and benefits in memory search
    Homa, Donald
    Crain, Ian
    Milliken, Ann Marie
    Newton, Craig
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 122 (01): : 99 - 110