Peer-assisted feedback: a successful approach for providing feedback on United States Medical Licensing Exam-style clinical skills exam notes in the United States

被引:3
|
作者
Nagoshi, Kira [1 ]
Zaidi, Zareen [2 ]
Wright, Ashleigh [2 ]
Stalvey, Carolyn [2 ]
机构
[1] Buchholz High Sch, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Clinical competence; Feedback; Medical students; Peer group; United States; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.29
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) promotes the development of communication, facilitates improvements in clinical skills, and is a way to provide feedback to learners. We utilized PAL as a conceptual framework to explore the feasibility of peer-assisted feedback (PAF) to improve note-writing skills without requiring faculty time. The aim was to assess whether PAL was a successful method to provide feedback on the United States Medical Licensing Exams (USMLE)-style clinical chills exam notes by using student feedback on a survey in the United States. Methods: The University of Florida College of Medicine administers clinical skills examination (CSEs) that include USMLE-like note-writing. PAL, in which students support the learning of their peers, was utilized as an alternative to faculty feedback. Second-year (MS2) and third-year (MS3) medical students taking CSEs participated in faculty-run note-grading sessions immediately after testing, which included explanations of grading rubrics and the feedback process. Students graded an anonymized peer's notes. The graded material was then forwarded anonymously to its student author to review Students were surveyed on their perceived ability to provide feedback and the benefits derived from PAF using a Likert scale (1-6) and open-ended comments during the 2017-2018 academic year. Results: Students felt generally positively about the activity, with mean scores for items related to educational value of 4.49 for MS2s and 5.11 for MS3s (out of 6). MS3s perceived peer feedback as constructive, felt that evaluating each other's notes was beneficial, and felt that the exercise would improve their future notes. While still positive, MS2 students gave lower scores than the MS3 students. Conclusion: PAF was a successful method of providing feedback on student CSE notes, especially for MS3s. MS2s commented that although they learned during the process, they might be more invested in improving their note-writing as they approach their own USMLE exam.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Residency applicants misinterpret their United States Medical Licensing Exam Scores
    Jones, Roger C.
    Desbiens, Norman A.
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 14 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [2] Impact of the United States medical licensing examination step 2 clinical skill exam on medical school clinical skills assessment
    Hauer, Karen E.
    Teherani, Arianne
    Kerr, Kathleen M.
    O'Sullivan, Patricia S.
    Irby, David M.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2006, 81 (10) : S13 - S16
  • [3] Residency applicants misinterpret their United States Medical Licensing Exam Scores
    Roger C. Jones
    Norman A. Desbiens
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2009, 14 : 5 - 10
  • [4] Assessing the communication and interpersonal skills of graduates of international medical schools as part of the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS) exam
    van Zanten, Marta
    Boulet, John R.
    McKinley, Danette W.
    DeChamplain, Andre
    Jobe, Ann C.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (10) : S65 - S68
  • [5] Does Step 3 of the United States Medical Licensing Exam Measure Clinical Competence? A Predictive Validity Study
    Violato C.
    Shen E.
    Gao H.
    Medical Science Educator, 2016, 26 (3) : 317 - 322
  • [6] The United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination: Potential Alternatives During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Fatima, Rawish
    Assaly, Ahmad R.
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Moussa, Mohamad
    Assaly, Ragheb
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [7] United States Medical Licensing Exam Step I Score as a Predictor of Neurosurgical Career Beyond Residency
    Gelinne, Aaron
    Zuckerman, Scott
    Benzil, Deborah
    Grady, Sean
    Callas, Peter
    Durham, Susan
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 84 (05) : 1028 - 1034
  • [8] Housestaff performance on the united states medical licensing exam and standardized patient encounters: A lack of correlation.
    Rifkin, WD
    Rifkin, AE
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 : 252 - 252
  • [9] Are United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 and 2 Scores Valid Measures for Postgraduate Medical Residency Selection Decisions?
    McGaghie, William C.
    Cohen, Elaine R.
    Wayne, Diane B.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2011, 86 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [10] Educational Videos Versus Question Banks: Maximizing Medical Student Performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Exam
    Clemmons, Karina R.
    Vuk, Jasna
    Jarrett, Diane M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)