Early routine percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis vs. standard therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis

被引:136
|
作者
Borgia, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Goodman, Shaun G. [3 ,4 ]
Halvorsen, Sigrun [5 ]
Cantor, Warren J. [6 ]
Piscione, Federico [7 ]
Le May, Michel R. [8 ]
Fernandez-Aviles, Francisco [9 ]
Sanchez, Pedro L. [9 ]
Dimopoulos, Konstantinos [1 ,2 ]
Scheller, Bruno [10 ]
Armstrong, Paul W. [11 ]
Di Mario, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Brompton Hosp, London SW3 6LY, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
[3] Univ Toronto, Canadian Heart Res Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[6] Southlake Reg Hlth Ctr, Newmarket, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
[8] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
[10] Univ Saarland, Homburg, Germany
[11] Univ Alberta, Canadian VIGOUR Ctr, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Early PCI; Fibrinolysis; Myocardial Infarction; MIDDLESBROUGH EARLY REVASCULARIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ISCHEMIA-GUIDED MANAGEMENT; RESCUE ANGIOPLASTY; REPERFUSION THERAPY; IMMEDIATE ANGIOPLASTY; CONSERVATIVE APPROACH; INVASIVE STRATEGY; THROMBOLYSIS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehq204
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Multiple trials in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared early routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after successful fibrinolysis vs. standard therapy limiting PCI only to patients without evidence of reperfusion (rescue PCI). These trials suggest that all patients receiving fibrinolysis should receive mechanical revascularization within 24 h from initial hospitalization. However, individual trials could not demonstrate a significant reduction in 'hard' endpoints such as death and reinfarction. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to define the benefits of early PCI after fibrinolysis over standard therapy on clinical and safety endpoints in STEMI. Methods and results We identified seven eligible trials, enrolling a total of 2961 patients. No difference was found in the incidence of death at 30 days between the two strategies. Early PCI after successful fibrinolysis reduced the rate of reinfarction (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.82; P = 0.003), the combined endpoint death/reinfarction (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88; P = 0.004) and recurrent ischaemia (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.13-0.49; P < 0.001) at 30-day follow-up. These advantages were achieved without a significant increase in major bleeding (OR: 0.93, 96% CI: 0.67-1.34; P = 0.70) or stroke (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.31-1.26; P = 0.21). The benefits of a routine invasive strategy over standard therapy were maintained at 6-12 months, with persistent significant reduction in the endpoints reinfarction (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.40-0.98; P = 0.01) and combined death/reinfarction (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.97; P = 0.03). Conclusion Early routine PCI after fibrinolysis in STEMI patients significantly reduced reinfarction and recurrent ischaemia at 1month, with no significant increase in adverse bleeding events compared to standard therapy. Benefits of early PCI persist at 6-12 month follow-up.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2156 / 2169
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of early percutaneous coronary intervention vs. standard therapy after fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: contribution of weighting the composite endpoint
    Bakal, Jeffrey A.
    Westerhout, Cynthia M.
    Cantor, Warren J.
    Fernandez-Aviles, Francisco
    Welsh, Robert C.
    Fitchett, David
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (12) : 903 - 908
  • [2] OPTIMAL TIMING OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AFTER FIBRINOLYSIS IN ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A META-ANALYSIS
    Desch, Steffen
    Eitel, Ingo
    de Waha, Suzanne
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Thiele, Holger
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)
  • [3] Fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial a infarction cardiogenic shock
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    Verghese, Dhiran
    Bell, Malcolm R.
    Murphree, Dennis H.
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Miller, Paul Elliott
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Prasad, Abhiram
    Sandhu, Gurpreet S.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    Singh, Mandeep
    Lerman, Amir
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (03): : 2025 - 2035
  • [4] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Fibrinolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Feng
    Guo, Qinglong
    Xie, Guoqiang
    Zhang, Han
    Wu, Yaxi
    Yang, Lixia
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [5] Safety of Very Early (< 3hrs) Routine Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Fibrinolysis in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Larson, David
    Garberich, Ross
    Lips, Daniel
    Burke, M. Nicholas
    Chavez, Ivan
    Sharkey, Scott
    Donovan, Claire
    Henry, Timothy
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (18) : B71 - B71
  • [6] Transradial vs Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
    Singh, Sukhchain
    Singh, Mukesh
    Grewal, Navsheen
    Khosla, Sandeep
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 32 (06) : 777 - 790
  • [7] Safety of Very Early (&lt;3hrs) Routine Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolysis in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Larson, David M.
    Garberich, Ross M.
    Lips, Daniel
    Burke, Nicholas
    Chavez, Ivan
    Sharkey, Scott
    Donovan, Claire
    Henry, Timothy D.
    CIRCULATION, 2016, 134
  • [8] The efficacy and safety of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention VS transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: A meta-analysis
    Pang, Jun
    Zhang, Zheng
    Yang, Yue-jin
    Li, Na
    Bai, Min
    Peng, Yu
    Zhang, Jin
    Li, Qiang
    Zhang, Bo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 177 (02) : 483 - 488
  • [9] Comparison of the cost in percutaneous coronary intervention between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs. non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Tsukasa Murakami
    Kenichi Sakakura
    Yousuke Taniguchi
    Kei Yamamoto
    Takunori Tsukui
    Masaru Seguchi
    Hiroyuki Jinnouchi
    Hiroshi Wada
    Hideo Fujita
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2022, 37 : 293 - 303
  • [10] Comparison of the cost in percutaneous coronary intervention between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs. non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Murakami, Tsukasa
    Sakakura, Kenichi
    Taniguchi, Yousuke
    Yamamoto, Kei
    Tsukui, Takunori
    Seguchi, Masaru
    Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Fujita, Hideo
    CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 37 (02) : 293 - 303